More Videos
- Fed to Keep Rates Low Despite Dollar's Fall: Bernanke
- Millions Could Have to Repay Part of Obama's Tax Credit
- Fed's Fisher: Government Debt Could Push Rates Higher
- What Recovery? Many Homeowners Still Underwater
- Gold Is in a 'Bubble' And Will Keep Going Higher: Gartman
- Diamonds: The Next Big Bubble to Burst?
- Slideshow: Madoff's Luxury Boats Go Up for Auction
- Solar Energy Emerges From a Dark Period
- How Much Do You Know About Green?
- Snoop Dogg Talks Biz
- Paulson Funds Report Q3 Performance
- Warren Buffett's Berkshire Portfolio Snapshot Coming Later Today
- 'Blood and Business Don't Mix' — A Family Business Survival Guide
- Mixed Signals Come From Retail Sector as Holidays Draw Near
- Will the S&P 500 Close Above 1100?
- What Were The Northwest Pilots Really Doing?
- Your Jobless Recovery Game Plan
- S&P to Hit 1,175 in the Short Term: Strategist
MOST SHARED
- BlackRock: Central Banks To Be Net Buyers of Gold
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Fed Likely to Keep Rates Low Despite Dollar's Fall: Bernanke
- U.S. May Wind Up Green With Envy
- Millions May Have to Repay Part of Obama Tax Credit
- Underwater Mortgages Could Sink Even Deeper
- Bernanke Offers Something For Everyone
- Gold Is in a 'Bubble' And Will Keep Going Higher: Gartman
- Cisco Ups Tandberg Bid, Claims Over 40% Backing
- Madoff Auction: $4,750 for a Decoy Duck?
Text Size 
As the financial crisis threatens to spiral out of control, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is taking extraordinary steps through the extensive authority granted to him under emergency rescue legislation.
 |
CNBC.com Henry Paulson |
In a news conference Friday evening, following the Group of Seven meeting in Washington, Paulson said the plan is to offer a term sheet for needy banks. The government will not get voting rights status for its injection in most cases. Paulson said the government's efforts were focusing on "liquidity" needs and "systemic risk."
Paulson said recapitalization was now "necessary" and would let "taxpayer dollars go further," because it is a "more efficient" use of capital than the auction process, which is meant to deal with illiquid assets.
"This a plan I am quite confident will work," Paulson said.
Still, not all economists heard all the details they wanted from Paulson's statement Friday night.
"There are few specifics," said economist Robert Brusca of FAO Economics. "Too many key words are vague and not well-specified."
Details of the plan were first reported by CNBC earlier Friday.
Even before details of the latest measures began to trickle out, there was heightened concern about the health of big institutions and the need for direct government support.
“I don't wish to spread alarm on the line people but the big issue confronting the market is I'm afraid the health and sustainability of Morgan Stanley [MS
Loading...
()
] and Goldman Sachs [GS
Loading...
()
]," Hugh Hendry, Partner and CIO at Eclectica, told CNBC early Friday. "It is unimaginable that they can be allowed to go, I suspect that they will be nationalized at some point today or over the weekend," he add.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008’s vague language gives Paulson almost unlimited power to intervene and leaves much up to interpretation.
In that context, some say cash injections could wind up being made to non-depository institutuons like investment banks, insurers and hedge funds. That issue was not addressed in Paulson's news conference Friday in either his remarks or the question-and-answer period, but at this point it is understood that the plan is meant for banks, savings and loans and credit unions.
 |
“He’s free to just strike deals, to do special deals,” says Lawrence White, a former White House economist and savings and loan regulator, who adds Congress was aware of the powers being given to Paulson and thus pressed hard for an oversight board.
Like the auction process, however, that board has yet to be set up, and with developments in the financial markets moving much faster than the Washington bureaucracy it might not be long before Paulson takes action.
Indeed, on Thursday, the Treasury indicated it would take action by the end of the month, but it now appears action may come sooner, based on comments by the Treasury Secretary and President Bush Friday. The President said the department would move quickly.
Independent bank analyst Bert Ely, who says he’s read the new law closely, sees no such specific authority for the Treasury in the EEA. "Presumably they have the authority some place—in this legislation or otherwise," he adds.
A staffer in the House Financial Services Committee says Congress was aware that the EEA would authorize the Treasury Secretary to make cash injections separate to the auction process.
When asked, if that authority also applied to non-depository institutions, the staffer was non-committal. It's unclear if those injections would have to yield an equity stake.
(Calls Thursday to the office of Sen. Christopher Dodd, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, and that of Sen. Charles Schumer, a vocal member of the panel, were either not answered or failed to yield comment. Sen. Richard Shelby, the Ranking Republican on the committee, who opposed the bill, had no comment.)
“I've got to think they have that figured out, to interpret the legislation broadly enough that they can do it," says Ely.
A government move to prop up an investment bank-turned bank-holding company, such as Morgan or Goldman is all the more likely given the growing consensus that says Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke erred in not rescuing Lehman Brothers three weeks ago, a date which happens to coincide with the beginning of the market’s deep descent.
Pressure has been mounting on Morgan Stanley for days now, amid growing speculation Japan's Mitsubishi UFJ will not proceed with plans to purchase a major stake. Goldman shares, in contrast, have held up relatively well compared to the broader market.
For the first time Thursday, the Treasury publically acknowledged that it was "seriously considering" capital injections. In doing so, the government was recognizing it “might have to do something different,” says Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic And Policy Research.
“In a sense, they are also following the markets,” adds Baker. “There was no burst of relief last week when the bill was passed. People were not impressed. He's [Paulson] got to take that seriously.”
In a news conference Wednesday, Paulson said the “primary motivation” of the government’s efforts was to lead to the “recapitalization” of the financial services industry, but he avoided outlining what circumstances would determine whether institutions would be allowed to fail or the government would step in to save them. He also declined to comment on whether he would consider a bank nationalization plan, such as the $77-billion one announced by the UK.
The decision not to seek voting rights is an important one. Banks are considered reluctant to give the government that sort of power as a shareholder. By avoiding the issue, the government is increasing its chance of obtaining broad industry acceptance, analysts say.
Bank nationalization would be a more extraordinary move for the US, but in a recent interview former FDIC Chairman William Isaac provided some rare insight into the matter. He said that during the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s when major money center banks were facing possible loan payment defaults by sovereign governments, the US “had a contingency plan in place to nationalize [the banks].”
“That's always going to be the answer," Isaac explained.
 |
Paulson diid not acknowledge that the recap plan might be considered a change of policy, maintaining that the problem has always been about a recapitaization of the industry.
Though deatils of the Treasury's term-sheet plan are just beginning to emerge, it is by no means a simple undertaking. There are some 8,400 banks and savings and loans in the country with government-insured deposits.
There’s also a sense that the concept of moral hazard may have become something of a luxury item in the current meltdown. The Fed and Treasury have already taken a number of unusual steps, from paying interest on bank deposits to backing up the commercial paper market to providing more than $100 billion in loans to the insurance giant American International Group. On top of that, there’s a growing chorus calling for governments to guarantee banks’ liabilities, which essentially separates credit risk from funding, and may encourage more lending among banks.
"They're prepared to do almost everything,” says Ely.
(Editor's Note: CNBC Senior Economics Reporter Steve Liesman provided exclusive and critical information to this story.)
Print
Email
- Where, what, how.
- CNBC's Jim Goldman asks: Has the sun begun to set on Twitter? Data suggests its best days are over.
- High unemployment is likely to persist for a while—you might need to change how you look for work.
- De Loach Vineyards is selling its pinot noir the old fashioned way, helping to cut energy and transportation costs.
- Why are the Chinese concerned about the progress of U.S. health care legislation?
- If a terrible driver on your morning commute has you feeling like you want to scream, check this out.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes