- Back Off, Regulators!
- iPhone, App Strategy the 'New Dot Com?'
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
- WoW Fights New Front in China
- Smart Phone Competition Heats Up. Again.
- A Tale of Two Smart Phone Makers
- Avatar Hype Soars Thanks to Tech
MOST SHARED
- Apple Surpasses Nokia as Top Cellphone Maker by Profits
- Herbalife Vs. Hedge Funds
- AIG CEO Ready to Quit over Pay Constraints: Report
- China Factory Output Leaps to 19-Month Highs
- Three Things the US Can Do To Stop the Dollar's Decline
- Cramer Jeers J&J, Applauds Abbott
- Gold Heading to $1150: Art Hogan
- America Is On Sale
- Beware of 'Trampling Effect' When Market Tops: Manager
- Gold Heading to $1150: Art Hogan
- Starbucks Brews Up Growth
- Farr: An Extended Period—No Fat Lady in Sight
- More Upside if S&P Passes This Number: Market Pro
- Murdoch Lashes Out At Google
- Fighting The Flu Vaccine Critics
- Nov. 10: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Shadow Inventory Dwarfs Loan Mods
- US Recovery to be Weak, Erratic: Top Fed Officials
- AIG CEO Ready to Quit over Pay Constraints: Report
- Retail Earnings in Focus Ahead of Shopping Season
- Apple Surpasses Nokia as Top Handset Maker by Profit
- Brazil's Largest Cities Hit by Blackout
- In This Relay-Race Market, Who Gets Baton Next?
- Workers Staying Put at Their Jobs as Jobless Surges
- Ponzi Proceeds: Bidding on Madoff's Toys
- Toll Brothers: More Contracts Signed, but Sales Down
RSS FEED
Tech Check
![]() |
CNBC.com |
Nuts no more, I suppose. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, speaking at the Gartner ITXpo in Orlando, Florida today said that an acquisition of Yahoo would still "make sense economically" for shareholders at both companies. His comments came during the question and answer portion of his keynote address. He says he doesn't know what price Yahoo would entertain now, but did suggest that Yahoo "probably thinks it's still worth at least as much today" as the $33 a share it was willing to accept way back when.
Remember that Microsoft was said to have gotten as high as $34 (correction from earlier posting) as Yahoo's management team continued to hold out for more, despite a 70 percent premium on the table. Talks ultimately broke off completely in what many believed at the time to be among the most bungled negotiation ploys by any company as far as Yahoo's strategy was concerned.
It's not clear whether Ballmer is merely speculating, or whether any kind of negotiations have resumed. I'm still trying to nail that down.
So here we are again. American Technology Research's Rob Sanderson wrote a report last week that a new offer by Microsoft may be in the offing. That heavy breathing you might be hearing is Sanderson taking his victory lap.
The facts are simple: Since these negotiations fell apart, Microsoft shares are down about 20 percent. But Yahoo has plunged 40 percent with no signs at all that any recovery is in the offing. Yahoo was trading in the $13 a share range, even dipped into the $12 range. With Microsoft's $25 billion cash position, it can write a check for Yahoo and its $18 billion market cap.
Yahoo's cheap. Microsoft still needs Yahoo. Yahoo still needs an exit strategy. The company will report earnings next Tuesday, and there's wide speculation that a major layoff and restructuring is being worked out as well. That could be critical window-dressing if a deal between Microsoft and Yahoo still has a chance. The reasons why Microsoft needs Yahoo haven't changed. Nor have the reasons why Yahoo needs Microsoft.
The deal makes sense. And for Yahoo shareholders, it's their only realistic chance of stemming the tide and putting a bottom on these shares. They hoped for a "top." They'll have to settle for a bottom.
UPDATE: I've just gotten off the phone with someone close to Microsoft. If negotiations of any kind had resumed, this person should know. This person tells me that no new negotiations of any kind have resumed between the two; that "Yahoo didn't want to be sold back then, and doesn't want to sell now. Nothing has changed on that front." But that's not to say that current economics wouldn't make a deal that much more attractive for both sides.
Questions? Comments?









