- To The Victor, Goes No Spoils
- How Healthy Is The National Lacrosse League?
- The “Real” Breakfast of Champions?
- Obama On A College Playoff: Picking His Battles
- Michael Jordan on Michael Jordan And His New Shoe
- Sitting Down With New York Yankees President Randy Levine
- Boston College Fires Coach For Talking And Your Emails
- College Football's Assistant Coaches Seeing Sweeter Futures
- Is Loyalty Overrated?
- Winning Bidder for the Cubs? Don't Hold Your Breath
- Pops & Drops: Sears, Palm...
- Next Weeks Big Mover – Health Care
- Careful Mr. Rubin, Clawbacks Could Be Coming
- Deep Concerns Over Big Changes At Citigroup
- Stocks Drop On Monster Job Losses
- Can Derivatives Save Housing?
- Quick Market Stats: Week Ending 1/09
- Attention Class of 2009—Don't Graduate!
- Stop Trading!: Sell the Oils
- Stability 'Unfolds' In China & Commodities: Market Strategist
- Stock Picks: Dividend Plays & More
- Satyam Chairman Arrested, Board Dismantled
- Congressional Democrats Recasting TARP In A Big Way
- Treasurys Boosted by Dismal Employment Picture
- Many Jobs on Wall Street May Never Come Back
- Obama Uses Jobs Report to Push for Stimulus Plan
- Nationwide Inquiry on Bids for Municipal Bonds
- TARP Fund Isn't Being Used to Help Housing: Panel

![]() |
Flickr |
Six years later, the San Francisco Giants are going to bring airline pricing to sports. The walk-up sales for hundreds of seats for each of next season's home games could dynamically change, based on supply and demand.
Brokers have done it forever, but teams haven't taken a shot at it. But the weak economy probably forced the issue, as teams are now going to look to get the most bang for their buck based on true market factors.
The bottom line is that variable pricing in its current state doesn't make complete sense. Packages are arranged based on how good a team is expected to be, a rivalry matchup, or day of the week, but it doesn't factor in the immediate, including weather.
USA Today is reporting that more than half of Major League Baseball teams are freezing or cutting ticket prices. That's great if you are the fan, but I think some teams are making a mistake and might be devaluing themselves.
My early findings have revealed that if your team is good, people are going to still show up. For most teams, quality on the field is still the most important determinant of attendance. To go a step further, there's not a city in particular that warrants a cut of prices because of its suffering — at least by looking at NBA, NFL and NHL attendance.
Sure, tell me that the automakers have led to blackouts for Detroit Lions games after 50 straight sellouts (it's because they can't win a game, not because they can't make a car) and I'll point to the fact that the Pistons and the Red Wings are first and third in overall attendance in their leagues.
The SF Giants are going to do very well with this program and I think, in the end, will find out that they're going to make more money through airline pricing than static pricing. At this point, many clubs wrongly see this as a risk and that's why it's going to take some time. But in two years, I'm thinking a third of the baseball teams will be doing this with thousands of their seats.
Questions? Comments?


