![]()
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Farrell: Signs of the Recession's End
- Michael Jackson Estate Hearing Underway
- Stop Trading, Listen to Cramer!
- Animalistic Behavior Against Novartis
- Pearl Izumi In Runner's World: Good Ad Or Bad?
- Banks Sitting On An Inventory Time Bomb
- Social Climbers: What's Next for Social Media?
- UPDATE: What Will Cisco Reveal About Economy?
- Citi Plans to Sell 20 Consumer Finance Businesses
- Swiss Re Makes Surprise Net Loss, Hedges Backfire
- Cisco Results Could Make Or Break Market Rally
- US to Sell More Inflation-Protected Bonds: Report
- Adidas Second-Quarter Profit Drops 93%
- Corporate Bond Rally May Be Over as Yields Pull Back
- Cash for Clunkers: Is It Worth Guzzling All That Cash?
- Buffett Accepts Resignation of NetJets Creator
- Sony Plans $199 US e-Reader, Takes on Amazon
- Warren Buffett 'Reluctantly' Accepts Decision By NetJets Creator To Step Down
- How to Cash in on Copper: Stock Picker
- Pullback is Coming — So Wait to Buy: Strategists
- Is It Worth Guzzling That 'Clunker' Cash?
- A Few Good Tweets (Updated)
- Discovery Doubles Earnings From Continuing Operations
- Animalistic Behavior Against Novartis
- 4 Internet Stocks on the Rise
- Henes' Lessons of the CEO: How to Succeed in Restructurings and Life
JPMorgan Chase, seeking to extricate itself from a federal bailout program, wants warrants held by the government to be sold at auction, after the Treasury Department demanded too high a price for the bank to buy them back.
The bank revealed its decision as a Congressional Oversight Panel overseeing the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program said it could could cost taxpayers billions of dollars if the government lets banks repurchase warrants too cheaply.
Valuing the warrants has become a flashpoint for some of the 10 large banks, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc
The repayments included $25 billion by JPMorgan [JPM
Loading...
()
], whose chief executive, Jamie Dimon, has described participation in TARP as a "scarlet letter" for banks.
"The objective is to get out of the clutches of government," said Marshall Front, chairman of Front Barnett Associates in Chicago. "That is an urgent objective."
The 10-year warrants were meant to allow taxpayers to share the upside as banks recover. Banks can buy back the warrants if they agree with the Treasury Department on the fair market value. Otherwise, Treasury can auction them to investors.
Seeking a 'True Market Price'
![]() |
Either way, the warrants will cost them. If investors exercise warrants they buy at auction, banks will have to issue more shares. On the other hand, if banks repurchase their warrants, that cost would reduce their earnings.
JPMorgan spokesman Joseph Evangelisti said an auction "is consistent with the Treasury's process, which we fully support, and it will result in the true market price for the warrants."
A Treasury representative said the government wants to dispose of warrants "in a manner that protects taxpayers."
According to the Congressional Oversight Panel, outstanding warrants industrywide could be worth anywhere from $4.71 billion to $12.27 billion.
The panel said 11 smaller banks were permitted to buy back their warrants at 66 percent of estimated fair market value, which means the government passed up $10 million of profit. It said taxpayers could lose $2.7 billion if the government accepted the same percentage on all the warrants it still holds.
Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard Law School professor who chairs the panel, told Reuters Television she was pleased with the decision to auction the JPMorgan warrants, which her panel estimated are worth $1.02 billion.
"When you go to the market, sometimes you get burned and sometimes you make out, but that really is fair market value in an open and transparent process," she said. "Nothing substitutes for real market valuations."
Other Banks
It is unclear whether the other nine big companies to repay TARP in June will seek to auction or buy back their warrants.
The nine are Goldman, Morgan Stanley, American Express
Bank of New York Mellon, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley declined to comment. The others had no immediate comment or did not immediately return calls seeking comment.











