×

Who wins Super Bowl of housing? Seattle or Boston

Talk all you want about deflated footballs and inflated ticket prices, the real competition worth watching is in housing. Seattle and Boston are two of the nation's hottest housing markets, and while many of their stats are similar, some aspects are winners, some losers.

Running the basics, per the U.S. Census, RealtyTrac and Redfin:

The Super Bowl of real estate

BOSTON
STAT
SEATTLE
629,182 Population 652,405
31 Median Age 36
69% Employment rate 73%
$53,601 Median Household Income $65,277
273,118 Total Housing Units 309,205
$371,000 Median SF Home Value $433,800
34% Home Ownership Rate 47%
802 Properties in foreclosure 1,743
$1,281 Median Rent $1,091
43.76 inches Average Annual Rainfall 34.1 inches
44 inches Average Annual Snowfall 6.8 inches
Click to edit
Suorce: U.S. Census, RealtyTrac and Redfin
Seattle, Washington (L) and Boston, Massachusettes (R)
Wolfgang Kaehler (L) | Scott Eisen (R) | Getty Images
Seattle, Washington (L) and Boston, Massachusettes (R)

So clearly, given incomes and home prices, it's slightly more affordable to buy a home in Boston, but it's far more expensive to rent. The vacancy rates are the same in both cities. For those of you who love older homes, Boston is a winner because nearly two-thirds of the homes there were built before 1960, compared to just half of Seattle homes.

Read MoreSeattle beats Denver...in housing and energy

Home sales have been more robust in Seattle recently than in Boston, at least compared to sales a year ago, but Boston is getting more supply than Seattle, which could mean far better sales in the spring market.

Seattle's homes may not be older, but its population is, with a median age of 36 versus 31 in Boston. Of course there are more women in Boston than men, compared with the equal split in Seattle.

For livablility—I've lived in both, and it's a tough comparison. Boston is more of a walking city, but Seattle's views and waterways are nothing short of stunning. Both cities are near enough to oceans and mountains for a day trip, but for travel around town, Boston easily surpasses Seattle in public transportation. Each city has a unique, strong character, but Boston wins on history, while Seattle's heavy tech center wins on the future.

For sushi: Seattle. For chowder: Boston.

To me, it's a toss-up, so take a look at some real estate eye candy from both:

James Kirkikis | Age Fotostock | Getty Images / Stefano Politi Markovina | AWL Images | Getty Images

Vote
Vote to see results
Total Votes:

Not a Scientific Survey. Results may not total 100% due to rounding.