Hillary's judgment problem

Hillary Clinton acknowledging that it would have been better to use two e-mail accounts is about as close to an apology from the Clintons you'll ever get. But the matter of "convenience" is just nonsense, as everyone knows. Even a tech dinosaur like myself has two e-mail accounts, which I now access on my spiffy new Apple iPhone 6 Plus. (By the way, instead of that old BlackBerry, Hillary should have had an iPhone).


Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sits during the Annual Women's Empowerment event at the United Nations in New York March 10, 2015.
Lucas Jackson | Reuters
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sits during the Annual Women's Empowerment event at the United Nations in New York March 10, 2015.

So Hillary says she didn't break any White House or State Department rules. I don't think that defense will fly. And the homemade server, created for messages between Bill and Hillary, is an absolute non-starter. Apparently Bill has only sent two e-mails in his life — and neither of them to Hillary.

Read MoreHillary's email issue has legs

There's also a dog-ate-my-homework quality to this Clinton episode, with Hillary saying: Sorry, I deleted the remaining 30,000 or so e-mails, so I just can't show them to you.

But those e-mails are out there in some cloud, or in some hard drive, or somewhere else. And Hillary has plainly stonewalled any proposals to have an independent counsel cull through the remaining e-mails.

Frankly, I don't believe any part of that story — how many e-mails she sent to the State Department, or how many are left. Just not credible.

Read MoreThe Apple Watch launch says a lot about Apple's bet on China

And this whole deletion thing is so Nixonian. Remember Rose Mary Woods and those mistakenly erased 18-or-so minutes of Watergate tape? Is it possible that Hillary is Nixon's political daughter, or at least his niece? And then there's the business about the Secret Service monitoring security threats from cyberspace hacking. Just doesn't fly. How do we know? Is the Secret Service going to issue a press release? Do we really believe they were involved in Hillary's homemade server in Chappaqua?

Please.

And what about the former ambassador to Kenya, the guy who Hillary fired because he was using personal e-mails? She denied it today, but he's out there giving interviews.

I'm no lawyer, so I can't tell if any laws were broken. And it sure seems like she broke some White House and State Department rules. But to me the real issue here boils down to judgment.

Read MoreThe DOJ's secret phone scanners

Hillary's homemade server system was clearly a security threat. That classified information essential to American protection could be cyber-hacked by Russia, China, North Korea, or Iran is something she obviously should have considered before she went ahead with this crazy scheme. And the notion that we are to believe there was no classified material in her personal e-mails, which included her government e-mails, defies all credulity.

This is bad judgment. It's especially bad judgment for a future president. The American public knows this. And really, so does she.

Commentary by Larry Kudlow, a senior contributor at CNBC and economics editor of the National Review. Follow him on Twitter @Larry_Kudlow.