The “Mad Money” host joined the Chicago Fed in calling for better risk control over financial engineering.
Once again, investor confidence was wounded, and Knight was almost destroyed. The error had decimated the firm’s capital base and rendered the firm insolvent.
After Knight Capital Group’s torrent of faulty trades on Wednesday that lost the firm $440 million, an expert warns the same type of glitch will happen again and could potentially afflict any trading firm.
The Knight trading glitch that resulted in the NYSE canceling trades in six stocks is the latest in a series of trading snafus to hit the market.
CNBC's Kayla Tausche reports the latest details on a House hearing over what went wrong with the social networking company's IPO last month and whether high frequency trading attributed to the problems.
Mad Money's Jim Cramer summarizes the war between "man and the machine," and CNBC's Bob Pisani and Eamon Javers offer insight on high-frequency trading. Justin Schack, Rosenblatt Securities managing director, weighs in.
Mark Zuckerberg may have lost a couple of billion today with Facebook's decline, but he's got billions more. Discussing whether investors in the stock should expect a rough week ahead, with Nathan Bachrach, The Financial Network CEO; and CNBC's Bob Pisani and Kayla Tausche.
Discussing the electronic trading systems behind the drama at the open of Facebook's listing on the Nasdaq and what could restore investor confidence, with Roger McNamee, Elevation Partners and Roelof Botha, Sequoia Capital.
CNBC's Eamon Javers reports on new data that shows controversial high-frequency trading may be more dangerous than investors originally thought.
It’s one of the biggest mysteries on Wall Street. How can stocks be in their fourth year of a bull market and trading activity be so low?
It was a bad day to be BATS. Its trading platform experienced a blunder on Apple—the highest-profile company in the world—and forced BAT to withdraw its IPO on the stock's first day of trading.
Do rapid-fire trading firms have an unfair advantage over the retail investor? Joe Saluzzi, Themis Trading co-head of equity trading, explains why he thinks the current trading system is broken.
Why have the financial markets recently rallied so sharply in places such as America? If you ask a trader, they will cite “rational” explanations, such as US bank stress tests, an improved US economic outlook, and decline in euro zone concerns. But if you ask John Coates, formerly a senior trader at Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs, there may be another factor at work: hormones, the Financial Times reports.
Computers and Bloomberg terminals dominate trading floors, but the human element remains a crucial feature of transacting across derivatives and other parts of the global financial system, the Financial Times reports.
Social media websites like Twitter and Facebook have become increasingly important to high frequency traders looking to anticipate market moves before they happen, but could they eventually become as significant as traditional business news providers in the world of high speed trading?
"It was the right thing to do, given he was the architect, according to what the papers are saying," says Kenneth Langone, Invemed Associates chairman/president; with Ron Baron, Baron Capital. They both weigh in on what MF Global's investigation says about the regulatory environment.
Summit hopes give risk-on currencies a lift, and there's a prize for a euro exit plan - time for your FX Fix.
"We need to fundamentally change the DNA of the banking system. Something like risk management needs to be rethought completely," Don Tapscott, author of Wikinomics & chairman of nGenera Insight think tank, told CNBC.
Stock trading performed almost entirely by computers is on the rise, provoking some weighty questions when it comes to markets: Will investing in shares become like chess, where only the very best humans can beat machines? Or is a human touch always superior to cold calculation?
Day after day, stocks swing sharply by hundreds of points. All of this anxiety has caused experts to ask whether there are new forces at work in the stock market that make trading permanently more erratic, the New York Times reports.