Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

Court Orders Some Stanford Ponzi Victims to Pay Money Back

 Text Size  
Published: Wednesday, 23 Jan 2013 | 1:25 PM ET
Scott Cohn By:

CNBC Senior Correspondent

F. Carter Smith | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Allen Stanford, accused of leading a $7 billion investment fraud scheme.

A federal judge in Dallas has approved a controversial plan to claw back millions of dollars from some investors in Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme. The investors — some 800 in all — withdrew more money than they put into their Stanford accounts.

They argued that their gains were legitimate, but court-appointed receiver Ralph Janvey, who is rounding up assets for all of Stanford's approximately 28,000 victims, argued the profits were fictitious and should be returned. (Read More: Allen Stanford: Descent from Billionaire to Inmate # 35017-183)

In a 32-page ruling, U.S. District Judge David Godbey agreed with Janvey, who now stands to collect some $220 million from the so-called "net winners" to redistribute to all of the victims.

"This decision represents an important milestone in the very long and difficult process of unwinding the massive Stanford Ponzi scheme," Janvey said in a statement.

The net winners argued they were entitled to keep some of their profits under the laws of Antigua, home of the Stanford bank that issued the certificates of deposit at the heart of the scheme. But Godbey ruled the scheme was based in Houston, making any discrepancies between Texas and Antiguan law a "false conflict." (Read More: Allen Stanford Investors Could Get (Tiny) Payout)

There was no immediate comment from the investors, but Godbey cleared the way for an immediate appeal, which is almost certain. That means it is unlikely the thousands of investors who lost money will be paid anytime soon, if ever. (Read More: White Collar 'Country Club' Prisons? Not So Much)

Earlier this month, an attorney for Janvey asked for permission to distribute $55 million to the investors, which represents less than one-and-a-half cents for every dollar they lost. The payment from the net winners would be on top of that. Another $300 million or so remains frozen in foreign accounts.

Allen Stanford, currently serving a 110-year prison sentence, is appealing his conviction last year on fraud and conspiracy charges.

—By CNBC's Scott Cohn; Follow him on Twitter: @ScottCohnCNBC

 Print
A federal judge in Dallas has approved a controversial plan to claw back millions of dollars from some investors in Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme. The investors — some 800 in all — withdrew more money than they put into their Stanford accounts. They argued that their gains were legitimate, but court-appointed receiver Ralph Janvey, who is rounding up assets for all of Stanford's approximately 28,000 victims, argued the profits were fictitious and should be returned.

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments:


                
            
            
        

Featured

American Greed

  • Trevor Cook appears to be a local boy who made good in Minneapolis, where he runs an investment fund called the Oxford Group. Along with three cohorts, Cook solicits an amazing $190 million dollars from 700 U.S. investors, many of whom heard his message through a talk radio star. The investors think their money is going into securities, but they'll be shocked to see how Trevor and his boys blow their hard-earned savings, turning a historic mansion into a den of debauchery.

  • By day, Trevor Cook and his associates claim to run a $4 billion hedge fund. By night, they convert their million dollar Minnesota mansion into a lurid den of decadence.

  • Minnesotan foreign currency trader Trevor Cook tries to recruit local investment banker Ty Schlobohm into his scheme. At first, Schlobohm's impressed with the plan, but does his research and soon learns that Cook and his cohorts are not who they seem.