Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

Cramer: Buybacks or Dividends – Which is Better for You?

 Text Size  
Published: Monday, 22 Apr 2013 | 6:30 PM ET
Lee Brodie By:

Producer

Cramer Sorts Out Buybacks & Dividends
Monday, 22 Apr 2013 | 6:40 PM ET
In the current market, investors are always hearing about buybacks and dividends. Cramer sorts out the confusion.

(Having trouble with the video? Click here!)

With so much cash on the balance sheet it seems these days you're always hearing about more buybacks or an increased dividend.

But if you're looking to put money to work, which is better?

"Companies have become enamored of buybacks as a way to return money to existing shareholders," said Cramer.

Sixty companies in the S&P 500 announced share buyback programs worth at least $1 billion in 2012. Within the group, the biggest buying back came from Johnson & Johnson, repurchasing $12.9 billion worth of stock.

And although a buyback can drive shares higher, as a strategy Cramer doesn't love it.

If you're a buy and hold retail investor, Cramer feels a buyback could go against you. That's because a buyback gives pros a reason to sell.

Confused?

The buyback conceivably drives shares higher. And as that happens, pros will often take gains and then put money to work, elsewhere. There's no reward for holding.

By comparison, dividends boost return to existing shareholders while simultaneously attracting new buyers. Therefore investors are inclined to hold while new buyers establish positions.


Ann Cutting | Photographer's Choice | Getty Images

Also, "Dividends are a much better sign that the management believes in the future than a buyback because buybacks typically end. Management is typically reluctant to take back a dividend– they are an out-loud declaration of long-term confidence," he said.

In addition, Cramer likes dividends as a way to navigate low interest rates.

"Dividend yield can provide a rate of return that savings accounts or certificate of deposits just can't," Cramer said.

Of course, the Mad Money host realizes that stocks present more risk than savings accounts or CD's but he feels relatively stable companies that pay dividends present a relatively safe way to invest.

"And if you reinvest those dividends you can augment your return to the point where you are far exceeding a return on bonds," Cramer said

In fact, Cramer said that dividends are so important that they have been responsible for almost 40% of the S&P 500's return in the last ten years.

And he likes the overall risk/reward in owning the shares, outright.

"Yes, those stocks can go down. But they can also go higher," he added.

"These days if management is looking to increase shareholder value and they don't suggest increasing the dividend, then count me out," said Cramer.

Dividends are that important. Buybacks, not nearly as much.

Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC

Questions for Cramer? madmoney@cnbc.com

Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? madcap@cnbc.com

 Print
With so much cash on the collective balance sheets, it seems these days you’re always hearing about more buybacks or an increased dividend. But which is better?
  Price   Change %Change
JNJ ---

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments:


                
            
            
        

Featured

Contact Mad Money

  • Showtimes

    Monday - Friday 6p | 11p ET
  • Cramer is host of CNBC's "Mad Money," and co-anchor of the 9 a.m. ET hour of CNBC's "Squawk on the Street."

Mad Money Features

  • Grab the latest CNBC gear from the NBCUniversal Store!

  • Get a behind-the-scenes look at how Cramer formulates his investment advice. "Inside the Madness" is a column, which features e-mails and more with Cramer and his researcher Nicole Urken.

  • You’ve always wanted to hit the “Hallelujah!” button. Here’s your chance.