Sequester Is 'Terrible, Terrible' Legislation: Rubin
By: The automatic across-the-board spending cuts — due to kick-in next month — is "terrible, terrible" legislation, Robert Rubin, former Clinton Treasury Secretary, told CNBC in an interview on Thursday.
(Read More: Breaking Up Banks Won't Solve 'Too Big to Fail:' Rubin)
The so-called "sequester" has become a household name, as Congress and the White House battle to rein in Washington's red ink.
Rubin said on "Squawk Box" that the legislation is only "an authorization measure" to cut spending.
So if President Barack Obama and Republican leaders fail to replace it by March 1, he explained, "the implementation would be at the time of the continuing resolution, which is March 27."
(Read More: Why Budget Cuts Could Throw Economy Into Recession)
The co-chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations added, "I thought we had a reasonable chance at a grand bargain," in the lead-up to the deal to avoid the "fiscal cliff."
Of course, that didn't happen, and he said that House Republicans did not engage with the president in the compromise process.
"Today there's virtually no bipartisan activity unless it's in response to a crisis or very special circumstances," Rubin argued, adding the polarization in Congress has "hardened substantially" since the era when Bill Clinton was president.
(Read More: Long-Term Unemployment Now a Thing of the Past?)
Comparing now and then, he told CNBC, "[If] President Obama faced the same political situation that President Clinton had, it would have been very difficult — just as it was very difficult for President Clinton." But he added, "Obama in a different style, in his own way, would have been equally effective working with the opposition."
—By CNBC's Matthew J. Belvedere; Follow him on Twitter @Matt_SquawkCNBC. Reuters also contributed to this report.
