GO
Loading...

Can the Apple Bear Be Killed?

Dana Blankenhorn | TheStreet.com Contributor
Thursday, 7 Mar 2013 | 12:48 PM ET
Getty Images

While we're all celebrating new highs in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Apple remains in the doldrums.

At its current value of about $430 a share, it's 270 points below its October high of $700. Over a quarter of a billion dollars in value has been destroyed. Doesn't sound like much in a market whose value is approaching $20 trillion, according to the Wilshire Index.

But consider this: Since October's Apple high, the Wilshire has advanced only a little more than 1,000 points, adding about $1.2 trillion to the market's value. If Apple had just stayed where it was, that figure would be about $1.45 trillion. For every $5 in total stock market advance during the period, Apple by itself lost the market $1.

The point is that what happens to Apple does matter to the total market. Even at its present depressed level, $400 billion is nothing to sneeze at.

Writers here at TheStreet.com are as confused as anyone else about what's going on. Rocco Pendola blames management. I'm more inclined to believe that everyone was "in" at $700 so there were no more buyers, and a rush to the exits ensued.

I personally believe Apple is just one solid press conference away from being a $500 stock, and one hit product away from being a $600 one. Mere rumors of an iPhone 5s sent the stock up 2.5 percent on Tuesday, TheStreet reported.

Doug Kass says Apple remains fine for trading and that he recently made a little money on it. Kass made the bear case in September, so his words here carry weight.

His earnings estimates are still below consensus, yet he's predicting nearly $42a share in 2013 earnings, implying a forward price-to-earnings ratio (PE) of just 10.1. And his bearish case sees earnings growing 10 percent per year. I think Kass sees Apple as fairly valued.

Intel currently carries a PE of 10.1. Analyst estimates for its earnings this year, according to Yahoo Finance, are $1.94/share, and for next year $2.10. Which would you rather own?

Apple's business problem is basic. Its markets have moved quickly, so while the iPad is only four years old its market is fairly mature and the iPhone's market is practically ancient. Value pricing is called for in these cases, but Apple doesn't do value pricing — it only does premium pricing. Thus, Apple has lost share and should continue to lose it.

Unless, that is, it creates new markets, or finds a way to deliver a value price with a premium margin.

Apple rumors involve three new products:

  1. An Apple TV, as CNET writes, a big screen with its iOS operating system acting as a set-top box compatible with other Apple devices and the iTunes store. Thus, you could program the evening's viewing from your iPhone at work and buy shows a la carte instead of taking cable. It would also make a sweet game machine. Figure most of us pay $3-4/day for cable and maybe we can all cut that cord.
  2. An Apple watch, which Bloomberg is reporting on. Apple has 79 patent applications using the word "wrist," a 10 percent share of the global industry would be a cool $6 billion, and margins on watches run as high as 60 percent.
  3. A cheaper iPhone, which, according to the International Business Times, would be aimed at China and Brazil, with features like fingerprint sensors for security and a push at the prepaid market.

Any one of these products could, with a little hype, move the stock. Apple product rumors are a mini-industry all their own. What if all these rumors should come true? Speculation arising from a press conference like that could easily make this a $500 stock within a week.

So you have a rock-solid stock with speculative potential, available at a PE ratio similar to that of Intel. I call that a solid investment—unless you already have a full plate of Apple shares like I do, and got in at around $560 right before the rest of the market began to boom.

By TheStreet.com's Dana Blankenhorn

Additional News: Google Focuses on Innovation, Not Stock Price—Exec

Additional Views: Facebook Is Better Than Google in Near Term—Analyst

___________________________
Disclosures:

At the time of publication, Dana Blankenhorn had a position in Apple.

___________________________

Disclaimer

  Price   Change %Change
DJIA
---
AAPL
---
GOOGL
---
593
---
WILSH 5000
---
INTC
---

Featured