The oil market has had a "remarkable three years" in the words of BP CEO Bob Dudley, with prices stable at around $100 per barrel as supply disruption in North Africa and the Middle East was matched by an unexpected increase in production from the U.S.
(Read more: We are not in any discussions with Iran: BP Chief)
However, analysts have flagged several factors that could disrupt this delicate equilibrium, including declining growth in energy demand, sabotage in Nigeria and the lifting of sanctions on Iran.
Read below to find out more.
Falling growth in energy demand
Global demand for energy will rise 41 percent between 2012 and 2035, or an average of 1.5 percent per annum, according to a BP report published last week. However, the rate of growth is seen declining during the period, from an average of 2 percent a year pre-2020, to 1.2 percent a year afterwards.
BP noted that growth in energy demand between 2002 and 2012 was the strongest ever seen in a 10-year period — a trend it was not expecting to be repeated in the short-to-medium-term, thanks to increased energy efficiency.
"That growth rate (between 2012 and 2035) is slower than what we have seen in previous decades, largely as a result of increasing energy efficiency… Energy efficiency promises to improve unabatedly, driven by globalization and competition," said BP.
Furthermore, oil is expected to be the slowest growing fuel during the period, with demand growing at an average of just 0.8 percent per annum.
"The oil market figures are staggering," BP Chief Economist Christof Ruehl told CNBC.
"By 2035, OECD oil demand will be back to where it was for 1985, and if you take a sub-set, namely the European Union, that demand will be back to where it was in 1967… This does raise the very intriguing question: is it possible, and what are the possibilities under which, you can have sustained economic growth with declining energy demand?"
(View more: Oil demand to decline before 2035: BP)
Iranian oil sales
If international sanctions against Iran are lifted this year, Iranian oil sales could return to the 2.5 million barrels per day (bpd) seen in early 2012, pushing global oil prices lower.
So far, Iran has struck a six-month interim deal with the UN Security Council, which took effect on January 20. The country agreed to limit its nuclear enrichment program in exchange for certain international sanctions being lifted. While Iran is still only allowed to sell 1 million bpd of crude oil, a successful deal could see a long-term pact being struck, with all sanctions — including those on oils sales — being lifted.
Political research firm Eurasia said such a deal would "almost certainly cause an (oil) self-off in an increasing bearish market".
(View more: What the Iran nuclear deal means for oil markets)
Arab Spring tensions remain
Supply tensions have been a key feature of the oil market since the Arab Spring in 2011, with disruption continuing in 2013-14 due to civil war in Syria.
(Read more: US failed over Syria, Saudi prince says)
BP estimated that political instability since the Arab Spring had removed more than 2 million bpd from the markets, and said history suggested production could take more than 10 years to recover.
Christopher Main, an oil strategist at Citi, said geopolitical instability was becoming more problematic for oil majors as they moved their drilling efforts away from established locations like the U.K.'s North Sea.
"The large growth areas you look at over the years are probably North America, South America, maybe West Africa and Iraq," Main told CNBC. "Iraq has been earmarked as having huge potential growth in both the north and south, but sectarian violence is causing more problems there."
He added that even in Brazil — another growth region — political turbulence was higher than in the likes of the U.K. or the U.S., and therefore held greater risks for oil firms.
"The geopolitical risk premium in Brazil would be higher than North America; there were riots there last year and there are ongoing issues with pre-sale auctions," Main said.
(View more: Riots break out across Brazil)
Sabotage and theft
Both theft and sabotage were increasingly problematic last year in Nigeria, where supermajors such as BP and Shell have significant interests.
Shell in particular suffered heavy pipeline outages in the country, which it attributed largely to stealing and deliberate destruction. As a result, its third quarter volumes were down 65,000 bpd on the year.
"We are facing headwinds from weak industry refining margins, and the security situation in Nigeria, which continue to erode the near-term outlook," Shell CEO Peter Voser said when the company's quarterly results were published in October.
(View more: Shell troubles are not new: Analyst)
The extremely unequal distribution of oil wealth in Nigeria has led to the industry being the target of anger, protest and sabotage. Meanwhile, a sophisticated industry has built up around stolen oil.
Roderick Bruce, an energy analyst at research firm IHS, said neither problem was likely to improve in 2014.
"2013 was a particularly bad year for security and instability in Nigeria and as far as I've heard from the oil companies themselves, they don't see it improving any time soon… the security situation is so bad they lose a lot of money due to pipeline outages," Bruce told CNBC.
Main warned that oil companies could face similar difficulties as they moved into other African countries.
"Sabotage happens in other African countries like Angola and Sudan — It's a function of political troubles," Main said.
(Read more: Africa now paying a 'democratic dividend')
Andy Lipow of Lipow Oil Associates said that crude oil theft had also been reported in Mexico, where the state-owned oil company Pemex had faced losses.
"I do not recall crude oil theft reports in other countries, but it is quite likely that they occur to some degree, especially if there is a lack of security," Lipow told CNBC.
As well as moving into new countries, oil companies are also heading further out to sea in search of untapped oil sources.
While the rewards can be great, the risks and costs can be as large. This was demonstrated by BP's 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which has so far cost the company $42.5 billion (pre-tax) in legal and environmental restoration costs.
Bruce named some of the difficulties involved in drilling for oil in new offshore locations.
"You are physically more remote, so it is more difficult to solve problems," he said.
"If you want to hire a drilling rig to go for an 'ultra-deep' well there is a limited number of them (drilling rig) in the world, so you have to pay a lot more money… There is huge investment required, and then often in new frontiers there is no existing infrastructure. You may be able to get the oil out of the ground, but then you need to get it back on shore."