"MetLife has served as a source of financial strength and stability during times of economic distress, including the 2008 financial crisis," MetLife CEO Steven Kandarian said in a statement. "MetLife is not ruling out any of the available remedies under Dodd-Frank to contest a SIFI designation."
The proposed designation is part of an effort to rein in the largest, most risky firms after the 2007-2009 credit crisis showed how one such firm's collapse could roil global markets.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform act automatically designated banks with over $50 billion as "systemic,'' but left it to FSOC to determine whether some non-banks also deserved the tag.
Read MoreUS bank regulators set to adopt liquidity, swaps margin rules
MetLife has more ardently argued against the designation than the other insurers, saying its business lines and risk-taking do not have the potential to destabilize the larger financial system.
The company now has 30 days to request a hearing before the FSOC, at which it will explain why it disagrees with the proposed designation. The council must schedule the hearing within 30 days and then has 60 days to make a final decision.
MetLife could eventually challenge any designation in court.
Read MoreBarney Frank's warning for Wall Street
"Insurance does not combine leverage with short-term funding, and does not display a mismatch inthe duration of assets and liabilities. For this reason, MetLife is unlikely topose a risk to stability of the financial system," Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of policy institute American Action Forum, said in a statement. "From the perspective of both process and policy decisions, the FSOC continues to need reform."
—By Reuters. CNBC contributed to this report.