|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Blog You!!!
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
Text Size 
Some pro sports leagues have enacted pay caps to ease fans' concerns. So if a chief executive's compensation strikes investors as too far out of whack, should the corporate world consider the same measure? Charles Elson, director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, votes yea. Contradicting him is Alan Murray, assistant managing editor at The Wall Street Journal. The two stated their cases to CNBC's Erin Burnett.
Murray called the very idea of instituting pay caps on executives "silly." He told "Street Signs" viewers that "putting arbitrary caps on a marketplace almost always fails." The editor's case in point: Whole Foods Market [WFMI
Loading...
()
], which tried it with an initial CEO pay scale set to eight times the pay of the "average worker." Murray notes that the ratio was raised to 19 times the average -- and even that "didn't tell you anything," because it didn't factor in stock options. Caps that exclude options, he said, are "a joke."
Elson agreed with Murray that the real solution must come internally, from a board that "negotiates hard" with the C-level suite -- and that a cap imposed "by Congress" would be "a terrible mistake." But the professor insisted that a board and a CEO who agreed to a "fixed ratio" would be doing a company good. He pointed to DuPont [DD
Loading...
()
] as a firm with an "informal cap" in the form of an average worker/highest officer ratio, which has reaped a "good talent group" that feels fully "incentivized."
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes