- Why You Should Play the Reflation Trade: Stock Picker
- Citi Mortgage Reveals What Treasury Won't
- S&P to Hit 1,200 by Year-End: Chief Investor
- Amended Berkshire Hathaway Filing Indicates No Secret Stock Stakes at End of Q3
- Facebook's Biggest-Ever Holiday Shopping Season
- Facebook's New Dual Class Structure - Slow Steps to an IPO
- 5 Big Bank Stocks Investors Should Consider: Strategists
- Gambling Drunk, Texting to Live And America's On Sale - Your Emails
- Nov. 24: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Americans Ditch Planes for Trains this Thanksgiving
- AIG Board OKs CEO Pay; Benmosche Agrees to Stay
- Half of Banks' Losses May Still Be Hidden: IMF Head
- Obama Reiterates Commitment to Boost US-India Ties
- FDIC's Bair Cautions on Risks in Bank Break-Up Plan
- Wednesday's Economic News Crunch Could Tilt Markets
- Call Me Crazy: Confessions of a Black Friday Shopper
- Turkey Day 101: How Well Do You Know Your Bird?
- Citi Mortgage Reveals Something the US Treasury Won't
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Wednesday's Economic News Crunch Could Tilt Markets
- NBA D-League On The Rise
- Obama Reiterates Commitment to Boost US-India Ties
- Japan Export Rebound Eases Fear of New Recession
- Australia Wheat Exporters Face Challenges: GrainCorp
- The Social Media Gaming Threat
- Stifling Anger at Work Can Kill, Survey Finds

Some pro sports leagues have enacted pay caps to ease fans' concerns. So if a chief executive's compensation strikes investors as too far out of whack, should the corporate world consider the same measure? Charles Elson, director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, votes yea. Contradicting him is Alan Murray, assistant managing editor at The Wall Street Journal. The two stated their cases to CNBC's Erin Burnett.
Murray called the very idea of instituting pay caps on executives "silly." He told "Street Signs" viewers that "putting arbitrary caps on a marketplace almost always fails." The editor's case in point: Whole Foods Market [WFMI
Loading...
()
], which tried it with an initial CEO pay scale set to eight times the pay of the "average worker." Murray notes that the ratio was raised to 19 times the average -- and even that "didn't tell you anything," because it didn't factor in stock options. Caps that exclude options, he said, are "a joke."
Elson agreed with Murray that the real solution must come internally, from a board that "negotiates hard" with the C-level suite -- and that a cap imposed "by Congress" would be "a terrible mistake." But the professor insisted that a board and a CEO who agreed to a "fixed ratio" would be doing a company good. He pointed to DuPont [DD
Loading...
()
] as a firm with an "informal cap" in the form of an average worker/highest officer ratio, which has reaped a "good talent group" that feels fully "incentivized."
- Remember when auto shows were major events where new models could generate buzz?
- CNBC’s Mike Huckman visits a cutting-edge plant to see how the flu vaccine of the future is being made.
- People who bottle up their anger at work are up to five times more likely to suffer a heart attack, a study found.
- Playboy will outsource its publishing operations in a bid to become profitable again.
- A new McDonald's in Manhattan is the nation's first to sport a sleek, chic interior imported from stores in London and Paris.
- For nearly three decades, these on-call experts have been dishing advice on how to – and not to – cook turkey.









