![]()
- With Investors So Bullish, Stock Pullback Must Be Ahead
- Is Bill Gross, PIMCO's Bond King, Losing His Touch?
- Greece Austerity Deal Runs Into Trouble Once Again
- Why Saving Greece Could Destroy the World
- Apple’s Record Run: $500 Is a Magic Number
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- Housing Still Hurting Consumers, Economy: Bernanke
- Get Ready for $5 Gas This Year: Ex-Shell CEO
- The World's Best Beers
- Dow vs. S&P 500: Which is a Better Investment?
- Mick Fleetwood on the MP3 ‘Dumbing Down’ of Music
- Avis on the Road to Strong Growth: Analyst
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- LinkedIn’s Growth Is Already Priced In: Analyst
- The Real Reason Behind Bank of America’s Rally
- 5 Hedge Funds’ Top Stocks Soar After 2011 Rout
- This Valentine’s Day Love Is Served on a Silver Platter
- CEO to CEO: Our Roles Are Changing
MOST SHARED
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- Pauley Perrette's Southern Bakery a Hit in Manhattan
- Stocks at Lows, 34 Italian Banks Downgraded
- GE Holds Dividend Steady; Fourth-Quarter Hike Seen
- US Trade Deficit Swells to $48.8 Billion on China Gap
- Confusing Chinese Data Signal Bearish Trend
- Japan Minister Makes Rare Remark on Yen Intervention
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- Kimco Realty CEO on Solid Earnings
- Bankers in Asia Aren't as Reviled as in West: DBS CEO
MOST POPULAR
HOT ON FACEBOOK
Supreme Court Rules Against Philip Morris in Tobacco Case
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a class-action lawsuit against Philip Morris USA, a unit of Altria Group, should not be decided in federal court, handing a defeat to the tobacco company.
The justices unanimously reversed a ruling that allowed Philip Morris [MO
Loading...
()
] to transfer the lawsuit to federal court from the Arkansas state court where it initially was filed.
At issue is a suit filed against Philip Morris by two Arkansas women alleging that the company engaged in unfair business practices in marketing its low-tar Cambridge Lights and Marlboro Lights cigarette brands.
Companies facing class-action lawsuits typically prefer to have those cases litigated in federal courts, where they usually fare better than in state courts.
Philip Morris succeeded in having the case moved to federal court, saying it was appropriate because cigarette advertisements had been regulated by a U.S. agency -- the Federal Trade Commission.
The move was subsequently upheld by a federal appeals court in St. Louis. The Justice Department told the Supreme Court that the appeals court's ruling should be overturned.
The Supreme Court agreed and reversed the ruling in an opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer.
Breyer said the fact that a federal regulatory agency directs, supervises and monitors a company's activities in considerable detail does not bring that company under the scope of the law that permits removal to federal court.
- Marketing clichés aside, sometimes diamonds are for investing.
- The ‘Fast Money’ traders weigh in on fashion related stocks from apparel to footwear.
- This list of the 10 most active cities for speed traps was compiled by Trapster.com. See if your town is there.
- This Valentine’s Day should prove a love fest for restaurants, as many couples will be dining out.
- Here’s a look at Westminster Kennel Club’s most successful breeds—and how much they cost.
- What kind of homes do celebrity couples share? Here’s our updated list. Take a look.











