- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
- For Video Game Makers, Stakes Are High for The Holidays
- Schork: Nat Gas Bulls Need a Snow Day
- Meet The Leaders of the New Retail Revolution
- HP's Challenge to Cisco
- Ford, Hyundai, Audi Gaining Interest
- This Drug Firm Will Snap Up 50% By Mid-2010: Trader
- Warren Buffett Ranked #14 On Forbes 'Most Powerful People' List
- What to Expect From Disney Earnings?
- For Video Game Makers, Stakes Are High for Holidays
- Obama Unveils Plans To Hold Jobs Summit in December
- 30 Year Mortgage Rate Falls Again; Lowest In Five Weeks
- No Near-Term Inflation Threat: Fed's Plosser
- Wal-Mart Holiday Forecast Light, Profit Beats
- US Mortgage Refinancing Up; Buying Demand Sinks
- Intel Agrees to Pay AMD $1.25 Billion to Settle Disputes
- Ford, Hyundai, Audi Gaining Consumer Interest
- Kohl's Profit Beats Street, But Outlook Falls Short
MOST SHARED
- Jobless Claims Post Another Drop as Picture Improves
- Wal-Mart Holiday Forecast Light, Profit Beats
- Obama Unveils Plans To Hold Jobs Summit in December
- Obama Most Powerful Person in World: Forbes
- How the Droid and Google Threaten the GPS Makers
- Highest State Foreclosure Rates
- Rising Jobless Biggest Threat to World Trade: WTO
- Meet The Leaders of the New Retail Revolution
- Pricier Beer Helps AB InBev Operating Profit
- Foreclosures Fall Again But Improvement Likely Fleeting

Josh Lerner, a professor at the Harvard Business School, told CNBC’s “Morning Call” that increasing taxes on private equity sounds like a good idea, but is unlikely to work in practice.
“On the one hand, there is a very strong equity argument,” Lerner said Wednesday. “Essentially, these are very wealthy people and it’s unclear why they should be paying lower marginal rates than everyone else."
"But there are also a lot of practicalities: I think it’s natural to worry that a) The tax won’t work and b) Even if it does work, there will be a lot of collateral damage to the economy as a whole. So, great in theory, but I think it’s unlikely to work in practice.”
Lerner said increasing taxes on private equity could have several unintended consequences.
“The big worry is that if we impose this tax, it’s likely that the carried interest will no longer stay at 20%,” Lerner said. “Groups will raise it...to 25% or 30%. That will depress interest on the part of pension funds, endowments and others investing in private equity, and we’ll have less private equity as a result.”
Lee Sheppard, contributing editor for Tax Notes, said it made sense to boost taxes on private equity.
“Clearly what the managers are getting is compensation for services,” Sheppard said. “The services they happen to be performing are trying to earn capital gains for other people, but that doesn’t mean there’s anything special about the services themselves. We tax other people’s services income as ordinary income, and that doesn't seem to stop them from working and trying to make more money.”
Morris Reid, managing director at Westin Rinehart, said it’s bad policy and bad politics to raise taxes on private equity.
“I think the time is bad for the Democrats to even be contemplating it -- during this critical presidential cycle,” Reid said. “I think we should be well aware that New York is already losing ground to foreign markets like London because of Sarbanes-Oxley. This scares me and I think it’s going to scare a lot of people."
- Billboard allows music lovers to watch concerts for free online, with five different camera angles.
- US real estate prices have fallen dramatically, but some places are still doing well. See the best-performing zip codes this year.
- An Italian cashmere maker aims to make profits while creating ideal conditions for his workers.
- Just in time for the holidays, the Triumph company of Japan offers the latest innovation in women’s undergarments.
- Vote and suggest your own, and remember--there's a fine line between a hero and a zero.
- The NYT explains what the Senate needs to do to improve cost and quality in U.S. health care.









