![]()
- Sweeping Health Care Overhaul Bill Passes House
- For the Jobless, 10% is Harder Than Before
- Week Ahead: Stocks Search for Catalyst in Quiet Week
- Outlook: Dollar Likely to Ride Higher on Bleak Jobs Report
- Geithner: More Stimulus, Not a Bank Tax
- Windfall is Seen as Bank Bonuses are Paid in Stock
- Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Says Net Income Tripled
- Cramer: Earnings, IPOs Dominate Next Week
- Buying Fear: How to Own Volatility
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Tommy Lee, Medical Tourism and Nasty Santa, Your Emails
- U.S. Markets Gain 3% for the Week Despite 10.2% Unemployment
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Stimulus II? Jobs Tax Credit=Cash For Clunkers
- Rockwell Automation Earnings: What Options Are Saying
- Gold Will Touch Higher Lows and Higher Highs: Analyst
- Is Misery Alive And Well in Your Office?
- Consumers Haven't Changed, They Are Just Pickier
MOST SHARED
- Solar Market Heating Back Up?
- Realty Execs See Pain Ahead
- US Becomes Top Country Brand Under Obama: Survey
- Sweeping Health Care Overhaul Bill Passes House
- Easy Money & Stocks
- BoA Board in Civil War Over Lewis' Succesor
- Administration Rejects Plan to Buy Fannie Mae Credits
- Want the Homebuyer's Tax Credit? Here Are Some Tips
There are not likely to be "significant spillover effects" from the housing crunch to the rest of the economy or the financial system, Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank president Charles Plosser said Wednesday.
Housing's drag on the US economy should "diminish but continue until sometime next year," he said in notes for a London speech released to reporters by the Philadelphia Fed.
One reason, he thinks, is that "the widely reported headline numbers overstate the decline in home prices."
As far as the financial effects, despite the recent sub-prime problems, "the financial system has not shown significant strain." How severe the effects may be on hedge funds remains to be seen, Plosser said.
Given the potential "dire consequences," should central bankers try to "prick the bubble" in housing or other assets? "My short answer to this question is no," he said.
In order for central bankers to do anything, he argued, "they first have to determine if, in fact, there is a bubble. In my mind, this turns out to be an overwhelming hurdle."
"What happens if central bankers raise rates and home prices do not decelerate, do they raise rates again?" Plosser asked. He also asked whether central bankers know what rate of house price appreciation is right.
Plosser queried what kind of damage could they do to other parts of the economy by trying to restrain housing.
In light of those questions, Plosser doubts monetary policy could be effective at restraining a boom.
- Rumors abound that Oprah will leave her show to start a new network. What would this mean for daytime TV?
- A private equity specialist sponsored a stand-up comedy troupe in New York to prove that CEOs can, in fact, be funny.
- Cramer did the research and found eight stocks that lead the pack. Read on to get his top picks.
- Did Hideki Matsui’s performance make it more likely that the Yankees will pay to have him back?
- Which wines should you bring—or serve—with holiday meals this year? Ask a connoisseur.
- Two competitors in this year’s World Series of Poker in Las Vegas have stories fit for Hollywood.











