- Schmidt on Social Media, Ads and Hulu
- Sun Valley on Social Media
- Eric Schmidt + Larry Page on Revolutionizing Computing
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Twitter in the Sun Valley Spotlight
- Sun Valley Dealmaking Confab Kicks Off
- Making Money on Michael Jackson's Memorial
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Another Music Lawsuit, but with an Unexpected Target
- Will Newspaper Readers Pay For Digital Content?
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Preparing for Retirement
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Warren Buffett's Complete Sun Valley CNBC Interview - Transcript and Video
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon Counting
- Investing in Tech Now
- The View From Newark
- Oil Price Dragging Market Lower
- Maria's Market Message
- China Demands Currency Reform, France Backs Debate
- Improving Morale Vital to Success and Survival
- Global Stimulus: Boosting Water Stocks
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Schork Oil Outlook: It’s Now or Never for the Bulls
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Farrell: Let's Enjoy the Numbers for a Moment
- Call Of Shame - Vote Now
- Schmidt on Social Media, Ads and Hulu
- 15 Stocks to Consider
- GM CEO Vows Leaner and Better Company To Emerge
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Farrell: Let's Enjoy the Numbers for a Moment
- JPMorgan Asks Treasury to Auction Warrants
- Geithner Seeks Clampdown on Derivatives Dealers
- A Muscle Car to the Rescue for General Motors
- UBS Can't Comply with US Request: Internal Memo
- Recession Special: Steak for $5!
- Ameriprise Paying $17.3 Million to Settle SEC Case
RSS FEED

![]() |
This issue has been in the news since the American Medical Association urged the MPAA to give movies with smoking an R rating earlier this year when the ratings board was in the process of updating its system. This would effectively push filmmakers to reduce smoking in their films since an R rating generally brings in a smaller audience than a PG-13 (why not try to maximize your audience). The MPAA hasn't made any bold moves in this direction--though they are saying they take it into account--but now Congress, and now Disney, are picking up the cause.
Update and Clarification: The MPAA isn't saying they'll give all movies with smoking an R, but they are moving very much in that direction. For the first time the organization is saying it now considers all smoking (not just underage smoking) in its rating system. It considers depictions that glamorize smoking or feature pervasive smoking outside a historical context "R" rated material, and its analysis of pervasive and glamorized smoking is included in film descriptions for parents. Taking those ratings guidelines a step further--and maybe its because Disney never wants an R rating --Disney is aiming to eliminate smoking entirely.
Disney's concern, is of course the fact that it's audience is so young: Representative Markey pointing out "the vast majority of smokers begin smoking before their 18th birthday". And those young smokers are of course Disney customers. So what about all those Disney DVDs out there with characters--animated and not--lighting up? (Don't forget that a greater percentage of Disney's revenue comes from DVDs than from a theatrical release). Iger says they'll put Public Service Announcements on those DVDs.
Why the dramatic apology and promise to Congress? Well, here's a comparison--FAT is the new tobacco, the new demonized industry, blamed by litigous customers and frustrated legislators. And of course McDonalds [MCD
Loading...
()
] is a target, so it's responded with both healthy alternatives, and clear cut nutrition information, so the chain doesn't have to take responsiblity for America's obesity problem. But tobacco is still the old tobacco. Rather than wait until Congress draws the connection between the young smoking age and images of smoking in decades' old Mickey Mouse cartoons, Disney is abdicating any responsibility. And wisely so. Plus, Disney's niche is "family friendly"-- which means they're not doing many of the historical film noirs that might suffer without cigarettes.
Will the other movie studios follow? Those like DreamWorks Animation which focus on that same family niche are likely to. Here's the link to the Disney letter.
Questions? Comments?







