- Tech Comes to Holiday Shopping's Rescue?
- 3D's Tipping Point and Your Living Room
- Silicon Valley and Hollywood Now Fast Friends
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
MOST SHARED
- Dubai Stocks Shed 7%, Abu Dhabi Tumbles 8%
- US Senator Opposes Fed Chief Bernanke Renomination
- South Korea Sees Exports Bouncing, but Risks Remain
- Governments Must Take Steps To Avoid More Dubais: El-Erian
- Dubai's Nakheel Seeks Suspension $5.25 Billion in Bonds
- Black Friday Sales Disappoint Investors; Amazon Up
- Tiger Woods Wants to Protect Family Privacy: Agent
- Dubai is Harsh Reminder of Prolonged Global Recovery
- BofA Aims to Clearly Spell Out Credit Card Terms
- Dubai Fear is 'Noise'—Stay Fully Invested: Strategist
- Tech Comes to Holiday Shopping's Rescue?
- Timeless and Time-Tested Warren Buffett Watch Predictions
- Roginsky: The Botax Whose Time Has Come
- Buy or Hold: Analyst Rates 10 Retail Stocks
- Execs: Tis The Season To Take Control
- November Winners & Losers
- Farrell: Testing Those International Waters Again
- Bob Doll: “We Continue to See Gains”
- Midwest Factory Activity Rose in October: Chicago Fed
- US to Push Mortgage Lenders to Modify More Loans
- Cyber Monday: The Last Vestige of Dotcom Hype
- Governments Must Act to Avoid More Dubais: El-Erian
- Regulators Compile Global List of 'Systemic Risk' Banks
- Dubai Stocks Shed 7%, Abu Dhabi Tumbles 8%
- The World's Biggest Debtor Nations
- Scientists Gone Wild: Climate Debate Turns Nasty
- BofA Aims to Clearly Spell Out Credit Card Terms
TECH CHECK VIDEO
RSS FEED
Tech Check
![]() |
AP Former Brocade CEO Gregory Reyes |
The sweeping verdict in the first-of-its-kind criminal case for the U.S. Justice Department sent a seismic ripple through this region yesterday. And the aftershocks will continue until we see the next trial begin, and the creative defenses that will now need to be constructed since the obvious ones didn't seem to work.
Reyes--and so many others--claimed no legal culpability because there was no personal financial gain. Buzzzzzzz. Wrong.
Reyes argued that he didn't know what his financial team was up to so therefore couldn't be held responsible for their actions. Buzzzzzzz. Wrong again. This jury apparently found that the buck really does stops with the CEO.
Reyes claimed ignorance about specific securities laws that he was apparently unaware that he was breaking. Buzzzzzzz. Wrong and wrong. The trial lasted six weeks. Hundreds of thousands of pages of exhibits. Seven full days of deliberation. This jury wasn't buying it.
So what happens next. There's been a fair amount of attention on Steve Jobs as the highest profile potential target for the feds. Not quite. True, the Justice Department investigation into him and his company continues, but the SEC already ended its investigation with action only against two of Jobs' underlings. Further, those feds lauded Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
] for the company's tremendous cooperation during the investigation. Jobs used many of the same arguments that Reyes did: he didn't benefit personally; he didn't know what his finance lieutenants were doing.
But the Justice Department will likely lend a large amount of deference to the SEC's findings and despite the Reyes conviction, likely won't bring charges against the Apple chief. Still, what had been a dormant news story will likely rear its ugly head again for those bloggers and reporters looking for a story that likely isn't one.
That leaves over 200 companies that have acknowledged some essence of a stock options backdating investigation where CEOs, CFOs, HR VPs and many others might be on the hook for illegal activity. And not the civil kind that can be squared away with a nice fat penalty check. These are criminal charges. And a criminal conviction. Reyes was once a dot com superstar, riding the bubble to a massive personal fortune. Now he faces 20 years in prison. It's a stunning, surprising fall from dot com grace. Stunning because every legal expert I've talked to, outside the prosecution team, is very surprised by this verdict.
The Reyes case is indeed a stunner, in part because just a few weeks ago it seemed like the judge in the case was prepared to toss it. Yet in a filing made public only after the verdict was announced, the judge dismissed the defense notion that no rational juror could render a conviction based on the evidence presented. The judge, in his order, said there was indeed sufficient evidence for jurors to reach a verdict. That was a crushing blow to the defense.
But the real news will come with the success or failure of the government's NEXT case. Scott Schools, the lead U.S. attorney on this in San Francisco, says each case will have to stand on its own. This first one could not have been more important for him, his team; for the Silicon Valley where options are the life-blood of the industry.
But one verdict does not a trend make and this case will absolutely be appealed. Reyes will be sentenced Nov. 21.
Questions? Comments?










