Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- Home Prices: Are We There Yet?
- Treasury: Jingle Mail A Myth
- How Bad Is The Housing Market? One Man's Tale
- Appraisal Code Sparks Huge Response
- New Rules on Home Appraisals End Up Thwarting Many Sales
- Mortgage Bankers Slash 2009 Forecasts
- $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Proposal
- Watch The Mortgage Apps
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- March Lows Will Hold — So Buy Equities: Strategists
- Lacoste Runs Full Page Ad With Roddick Loss
- Brandt: Bing, The Little Search Engine That Couldn't
- 5-Star Manager's 5 Top Stocks
- Hey, What's Up Doc?
- Busch: Summertime Blues Hits Investors
- Chadwick: Recession and Scandals Pave the Way for Romney 2012
- Art Cashin: The S&P's 'Head and Shoulders' Number
- Michael Jackson: Death And Taxes
- Second Half: Wait For Pullbacks, Then Buy the Best
- Discover Shares Fall on Word of Stock Offering
- California General Obligation Bond Rating Cut
- GM to Get Final $20 Billlion From US This Year
- Goldman Sees No Harm From Computer Programmer
- World Trade Center Developer Threatens Arbitration
- The Weirdest Currencies on Earth
- Judge Gives Control of Jackson Estate to Executors
- Recession Special: Wine Cheaper Than Water!
RSS FEED

![]() |
AP |
The image behind this movement is of a homeowner who was either duped into a bad loan or caught up in the frenzy of the new loan products that they didn’t really understand, and that is true in many cases. But if you really go digging into the MBA survey and pull out some essential stats buried in their ridiculously dense charts (no offense MBAers but this is a lot for even a real estate nut like me to take in), they paint a slightly different picture that regulators and lawmakers should really take into account.
The bulk of foreclosures are essentially in seven states: The first three, Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana are all due to trouble in the local economies, and they weren’t in great shape even during the housing boom. The other four states, California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida are the states that led the real estate boom, thanks to heavy investor-speculators buying up properties they never intended to inhabit.
Now break it down even further, and you find that the four investor states, which make up 24.8% of all outstanding loans in this country, make up nearly 29% of all foreclosures started in the second quarter of this year!
Take it down another notch to the types of loans. We’re all well-versed now in those adjustable rate mortgages, the often really cheap, no-money-down loans with unbelievable teaser rates: the faves of investors and of aggressive, boom-frenzied lenders. Well, my fab-four states use 42.5% of all the prime ARMs out there in the nation and 34.6% of all the nation’s subprime ARMs, so you see where this is going.
The Mortgage Bankers also took a look at non-owner-occupied homes, which you have to assume are mostly homes owned by investors who are either just holding empty properties or renting them out until they’re ready to flip ‘em. Mortgages on these properties made up 16% of prime defaults as of June 30 of this year nationwide. Now to my fab-four states again: Non-owner-occupied homes made up 32% of prime defaults in Nevada, 26% in Arizona, 25% in Florida and 21% in California…that’s twice the rate of the rest of the nation.
And guess what? If you strip out the four big investor states, my fab-four, the MBA survey on foreclosures would actually show a nationwide drop in the new foreclosure rate. Think about that, Washington, when you feel the need to cry bailout.
Questions? Comments?











