- Warren Buffett and J.P. Morgan: The Return of "Profitable Patriotism" After 101 Years
- CNBC TRANSCRIPT: Warren Buffett Warns Rescue Package Won't Be "Panacea" for Troubled Economy
- Warren Buffett to CNBC: Rescue Bill Will Help, But Not "Panacea" for Economy
- Warren Buffett: Treasury Should Team With Private Investors to Buy Distressed Assets
- Warren Buffett: I Haven't Seen As Much Economic Fear In My Adult Lifetime - Charlie Rose Interview
- Warren Buffett's Three Rules for Investing In a Crisis
- Warren Buffett Casts Vote of Confidence In General Electric With $3B Investment
- Warren Buffett Stake Sends Chinese Battery Maker's Shares 42% Higher in Hong Kong
- Warren Buffett on Snowballs, Family Time, Thriftiness, Vegetables, and the Bank of Reputation
- Warren Buffett's "Self-Doubt and Vulnerability" Surprise Bio Author
- Mad Mail: Handling a 401(k) in This Market
- Lightning Round: RIMM, Visa, Diageo and More
- Lightning Round OT: Mercadolibre, Tetra Tech and More
- Executive Decision: Chattem CEO Zan Guerry
- Cramer’s Five-Year Plan
- Putting the Paulson Plan to Work
- Your First Move For Tuesday Oct. 7th
- Web Extra: Options Action
- How To Fix Wall Street
- Iceland Fears Remain as Russian Loan Doubtful
- EU Won't Manage Unified Banking Plan
- Toshiba in Talks to Buy Spansion: Sources
- Banks Lead Euro Shares Lower
- What the Pros Say: Coordinated Cuts Coming
- Bank of Japan Holds Rates; Cautious on Crisis, Economy
- European Shares Set to Retrace Some Losses
- Fed, Treasury Mulling Commercial Paper Support
- Australia's C. Bank Stuns with Full-Point Cut

![]() |
AP PetroChina Jilin Petrochemical Company refineries in Jilin, northeast China. 2004 File Photo |
The question is: Is Buffett selling for the profits or to make a statement against China's human-rights record in Darfur?
The Reuters story on CNBC.com casts it as profit-taking. It quotes Imperial Dragon Asset Management's Dale Tsang as saying, "He's selling into strength. He's taking his chips off the table slowly. PetroChina isn't a growth story anymore. A lot has been priced in already."
After Berkshire sold $17 million worth of PetroChina back in July, there were some suggestions Buffett was responding to human-rights activists calling on him to divest because, they argue, Chinese investments in Sudan's oil industry are helping that country resist international pressure over the killings in Darfur.
Profits or pressure? We certainly don't know for sure, but in the past Buffett has said PetroChina has nothing to do with Darfur. If I had to guess, I'd guess profits are the prime motivator.. but doing the "right thing" probably doesn't hurt.
Questions? Comments? Email me at




