- 3D's Tipping Point and Your Living Room
- Silicon Valley and Hollywood Now Fast Friends
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Wednesday's Economic News Crunch Could Tilt Markets
- NBA D-League On The Rise
- The Social Media Gaming Threat
- Obama Reiterates Commitment to Boost US-India Ties
- Stifling Anger at Work Can Kill, Survey Finds
- Japan Export Rebound Eases Fear of New Recession
- Australia Wheat Exporters Face Challenges: GrainCorp
- Citi Mortgage Reveals What Treasury Won't
- S&P to Hit 1,200 by Year-End: Chief Investor
- Amended Berkshire Hathaway Filing Indicates No Secret Stock Stakes at End of Q3
- Facebook's Biggest-Ever Holiday Shopping Season
- Facebook's New Dual Class Structure - Slow Steps to an IPO
- 5 Big Bank Stocks Investors Should Consider: Strategists
- Gambling Drunk, Texting to Live And America's On Sale - Your Emails
- Nov. 24: Unusual Volume Leaders
- NBA D-League On The Rise
- Sales of New Homes Forecast to Rise 2%
- Americans Ditch Planes for Trains this Thanksgiving
- Half of Banks' Losses May Still Be Hidden: IMF Head
- Obama Reiterates Commitment to Boost US-India Ties
- FDIC's Bair Cautions on Risks in Bank Break-Up Plan
- Wednesday's Economic News Crunch Could Tilt Markets
- Call Me Crazy: Confessions of a Black Friday Shopper
- Starbucks Eyes China as Next Major Market
- Citi Mortgage Reveals Something the US Treasury Won't
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
The EU's Court of First Instance says the anti-trust commission was correct when it determined that Microsoft abused its dominant position in the software world to hold back competition in everything from operating systems to server software to media players.
Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] found today's news "disappointing."
Microsoft must now share Windows source code with competitors and offer a version of Windows without the Windows Media Player.
Of course, few consumers will actually want Windows without the media player whether they use that software or not. Which means the penalty, beyond the fine, which amounts to nothing more than a parking ticket for the company, won't do much. And worse, it may end up hurting consumers.
This statement this morning from Thomas O. Barnett, Assistant Attorney General for the U.S. Justice Department's Antitrust Division: “In light of the United States’ own antitrust case and judgment against Microsoft, and the importance of the computer industry to consumers and to the global economy, the United States has a particular interest in today’s CFI decision... We are...concerned that the standard applied to unilateral conduct by the CFI, rather than helping consumers, may have the unfortunate consequence of harming consumers by chilling innovation and discouraging competition."
He adds: “In the United States, the antitrust laws are enforced to protect consumers by protecting competition, not competitors. In the absence of demonstrable consumer harm, all companies, including dominant firms, are encouraged to compete vigorously. U.S. courts recognize the potential benefits to consumers when a company, including a dominant company, makes unilateral business decisions, for example to add features to its popular products or license its intellectual property to rivals, or to refuse to do so."
These are important considerations since the EU has made no secret that it will be going after Intel [INTC
Loading...
()
] , is mulling action against Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] , and who knows, may end up with Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
] in its crosshairs as well. Any company with a dominant position that aggressively seeks to protect that position could be fair game. And if the courts find fault, the remedies run the risk of punishing companies, as well as consumers as a kind of antitrust collateral damage.
Something to consider since there are so many other cases, with potentially huge ramifications for some of the biggest names in technology. I'm not saying Microsoft's behavior was unfairly punished. Quite the contrary. It's just that the courts ought to consider consumers just as much as they consider competitors when doling out decisions.
Microsoft has not decided yet whether to appeal today's ruling.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes