FEATURED SLIDESHOW
Who Is The Worst CEO?Mad Money needed new inductees for its
Wall of Shame, so we asked viewers for
nominations.
RECENT POSTS
- Remorseful Regulator Leads Reform Fight
- Lightning Round: AT&T, Verizon, Novartis and More
- Lightning Round OT: Alcoa, Weight Watchers and More
- Why Amazon Rules Retail
- Nordic American: Sinking Ship or Titan Tanker?
- Cramer: What Monday’s Housing Number Really Means
- Cramer: Buy These Banks, If...
- Time to Buy Treasurys?
- Lightning Round: Las Vegas Sands, ADC Telecom, Satyam Computer and More
- Lightning Round OT: Knight Capital, Ebix and More
Text Size 
 |
That’s why he was bullish on Wells Fargo [WFC
Loading...
()
], Bank of America [BAC
Loading...
()
] and US Bancorp [USB
Loading...
()
] before Tuesday’s 50-basis-point rate cut, but now thinks Wachovia [WB
Loading...
()
] is the better trade.
If the Fed hadn’t taken such drastic action, the market never would have seen the 300-point jump it got earlier this week. The crisis would have continued. Then investors would have wanted banks with more diverse and deeper balance sheets, banks like WFC, BAC and USB that would have thrived no matter what, Cramer said.
But that’s not what happened. In a sense, the world changed after that rate cut. Now a beaten-up stock like Wachovia has a better chance of surging back to the black, which means its valuation will increase a lot more than the steadier Wells Fargo. And that should equal profits for investors.
So from a strict trader perspective, Cramer would recommend selling WFC, BAC and USB and buying Wachovia. That 5% yield is too good to ignore. Home Gamers, though, should probably stick with Wells Fargo, Bank of America and US Bancorp if they’re thinking longer term, Cramer said.
Questions for Cramer?
Questions, comments, suggestions for the Mad Money website?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes