|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- Rich People With A Death Wish
- Facebook Director Sees 'Billions' in Revenue in 5 Years
- The Threat of Ballooning Pensions
- Lehman CEO: Firm Deserved Bailout or 'Wind Down'
- FedEx Sees Signs of a Turnaround: Report
- Texting And Driving Worse Than Drinking and Driving
- Market's Monday Blues
- Hey, What's Up Doc?
- Judge Gives Control of Jackson Estate to Executors
- March Lows Will Hold — So Buy Equities: Strategists
- Lacoste Runs Full Page Ad With Roddick Loss
- Brandt: Bing, The Little Search Engine That Couldn't
- 5-Star Manager's 5 Top Stocks
- Hey, What's Up Doc?
- Busch: Summertime Blues Hits Investors
- Chadwick: Recession and Scandals Pave the Way for Romney 2012
- Art Cashin: The S&P's 'Head and Shoulders' Number
- Michael Jackson: Death And Taxes
- Second Half: Wait For Pullbacks, Then Buy the Best
- Accused Ex-Goldman Sachs Programmer Out on Bail
- Discover Shares Fall on Word of Stock Offering
- California General Obligation Bond Rating Cut
- GM to Get Final $20 Billlion From US This Year
- World Trade Center Developer Threatens Arbitration
- The Weirdest Currencies on Earth
- Judge Gives Control of Jackson Estate to Executors
- Recession Special: Wine Cheaper Than Water!

![]() |
AP |
But more significant was what DIDN'T happen. Her top rival, Barack Obama, checked his swing on the fastball that Russert grooved over the center of the plate on voter fatigue with polarization and scandals. Asked directly whether he was referring to both the Bush and Clinton eras in his calls to "turn the page", Obama declined to say yes. In fact he IS referring to both, but is reluctant to say so for fear of muddying his strategy of rising above bickering.
That might be a fine strategy, yet it's at odds with his commitment to tell voters bluntly what he thinks. And polls nationally, and here in New Hampshire, indicate that's he's heading in the wrong direction in his attempt to catch her.
Yet Clinton missed big opportunities as well. On Social Security, she refused to say whether she'd raise taxes--or do anything in particular--to shore up the system. I don't know anyone in either party who doubts she'd do exactly that, which means her answer underscored her vulnerability on questions of candor and straightforwardness.
And Clinton also passed up the chance to demand that her husband's library and foundation disclose its donors. At a time when Norman Hsu has revived the issue of campaign finance scandal in the Clinton political world, that was a striking failure. By saying "You'll have to ask them," Clinton undercut her earlier assertion of strength. That means the issues of independence and baggage remain on the table.
Questions? Comments? Write to .







