|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- 'We're in the Middle of a Crash': Black Swan
- Latvian Banker Taking Souls as Collateral
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- US Home Prices Seen Falling 40% Overall: Analyst
- Cuddle Parties Heat Up
- The Worst Expected 2010 State Budget Gaps
- Malaysia PM Speaks to CNBC
- NY City Apartment Sales Down More Than 50%
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Will Resign
- Fireworks At Pharma's Market
- Value of Warren Buffett's Annual Gift to Gates Foundation Falls Along With Berkshire's Stock
- Michael Jackson: The Music And The Money
- Five Stock Picks for This Market
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- Weak Dollar Means Gold at $1,040: Strategist
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- North Korea Fires Short Range Missiles: Reports
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- Major Nations Should Back the Dollar: Japan
- Earnings Season: A Likely Game-Changer
- Slideshow: Best-Selling Fourth of July Fireworks
- Latvian Banker Taking Souls as Collateral
- OPEC President Says Is Satisfied with Current Oil Price
- Divisions Dominate as Third Quarter Begins
Text Size 
Editor's Note:
Dear folks,
You guys are good. Real good. You are truly a force on World Wide Web and I tip my hat to you.
That's based on my first hand experience of your work regarding our CNBC Republican candidate debate. After the debate, we put up a poll on our Web site asking who readers thought won the debate. You guys flooded it.
Now these Internet polls are admittedly unscientific and subject to hacking. In the end, they are really just a way to engage the reader and take a quick temperature reading of your audience. Nothing more and nothing less. The cyber equivalent of asking the room for a show of hands on a certain question.
So there was our after-debate poll. The numbers grew ... 7,000-plus votes after a couple of hours ... and Ron Paul was at 75%.
Now Paul is a fine gentleman with some substantial backing and, by the way, was a dynamic presence throughout the debate , but I haven't seen him pull those kind of numbers in any "legit" poll. Our poll was either hacked or the target of a campaign. So we took the poll down.
The next day, our email basket was flooded with Ron Paul support messages. And the computer logs showed the poll had been hit with traffic from Ron Paul chat sites. I learned other Internet polls that night had been hit in similar fashion. Congratulations. You folks are obviously well-organized and feel strongly about your candidate and I can't help but admire that.
But you also ruined the purpose of the poll. It was no longer an honest "show of hands" -- it suddenly was a platform for beating the Ron Paul drum. That certainly wasn't our intention and certainly doesn't serve our readers ... at least those who aren't already in the Ron Paul camp.
Some of you Ron Paul fans take issue with my decision to take the poll down. Fine. When a well-organized and committed "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many," I get a little worried. I'd take it down again.
Sincerely,
Allen Wastler
Managing Editor, CNBC.com
Questions? Comments? Write to .
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes