
- GM Net Income of $10 Billion Isn't 'Crazy': Steven Rattner
- After The Super Bowl: Who’s Buying?
- S&P 500 Earnings: Industrials Lead
- Will Super Bowl Ad Buzz Generate Sales Buzz?
- 5 Stocks That Pay You Twice as Much as Treasurys
- Running Robo-Settlement Numbers
- ‘Goodnight iPad’ — A Bedtime Story for Adults
- 4 Reasons Why Google Should Buy Twitter
- Zynga Set to Ride on Facebook's Coattails: Analyst
- China Growth Could Halve If Europe Crisis Worsens: IMF
- Traders Watch Bernanke for Any Shift After Jobs Report
- Japan Chooses Stealth Intervention to Curb Yen Rise
- Super Bowl, Madonna Set New TV Audience Records
- Why Oil Prices Aren't Rising Despite Sanctions on Iran
- Greece Is a 'Sideshow' for Investors: Fund Manager
- Investors Wary of Stocks Are Flocking to Junk Bonds
- After US Oil Snub, Canada Focuses on China
- Saudi Arabia Will Not Let Oil Go Above $100: Prince
MOST SHARED
- Stock Gains Turn Hedge Fund Losers Into Winners
- After US Oil Snub, Canada Focuses on China
- RBA Unexpectedly Holds Rates, Leaves Door Open to Cut
- Yum Brands Profit Rises as China Keeps Growing
- Saudi Arabia Will Not Let Oil Go Above $100: Prince
- Gold Steady; Watches Greece Development
- Two Firms Flourish in Frenzied MF Global Aftermath
- Estee Lauder Forecast Lower Profit on Ad Spending
An Open Letter to the Ron Paul Faithful
Editor's Note:
Dear folks,
You guys are good. Real good. You are truly a force on World Wide Web and I tip my hat to you.
That's based on my first hand experience of your work regarding our CNBC Republican candidate debate. After the debate, we put up a poll on our Web site asking who readers thought won the debate. You guys flooded it.
Now these Internet polls are admittedly unscientific and subject to hacking. In the end, they are really just a way to engage the reader and take a quick temperature reading of your audience. Nothing more and nothing less. The cyber equivalent of asking the room for a show of hands on a certain question.
So there was our after-debate poll. The numbers grew ... 7,000-plus votes after a couple of hours ... and Ron Paul was at 75%.
Now Paul is a fine gentleman with some substantial backing and, by the way, was a dynamic presence throughout the debate , but I haven't seen him pull those kind of numbers in any "legit" poll. Our poll was either hacked or the target of a campaign. So we took the poll down.
The next day, our email basket was flooded with Ron Paul support messages. And the computer logs showed the poll had been hit with traffic from Ron Paul chat sites. I learned other Internet polls that night had been hit in similar fashion. Congratulations. You folks are obviously well-organized and feel strongly about your candidate and I can't help but admire that.
But you also ruined the purpose of the poll. It was no longer an honest "show of hands" -- it suddenly was a platform for beating the Ron Paul drum. That certainly wasn't our intention and certainly doesn't serve our readers ... at least those who aren't already in the Ron Paul camp.
Some of you Ron Paul fans take issue with my decision to take the poll down. Fine. When a well-organized and committed "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many," I get a little worried. I'd take it down again.
Sincerely,
Allen Wastler
Managing Editor, CNBC.com
Questions? Comments? Write to .
- What happens at work when you can’t focus, and can’t do anything? Do you throw in the towel?
- BHP's CEO said he would buy investors a beer if he offloaded its nickel operations. One trader says it's time to pay up.
- The year of the dragon, a zodiac sign associated with wealth and power, is expected to lead to a baby boom in China.
- The epicenter of the oil rush is Williston, ND. Brian Shactman is there for a look at a town like no other.
- Which Super Bowl ad run by automakers is generating the greatest buzz? Phil LeBeau has some answers.
- We're so connected during the day it becomes difficult to disconnect at night. Here’s one way to get sleep.











