
- The Real Reason Behind Bank of America’s Rally
- 5 Hedge Funds’ Top Stocks Soar After 2011 Rout
- This Valentine’s Day Love Is Served on a Silver Platter
- CEO to CEO: Our Roles Are Changing
- Clint Eastwood ‘Surprised’ by Reaction to Chrysler's ‘Halftime in America’ Ad
- Bulls Check In to Community Health
- Bank of America’s Worst-Case Scenario Gets More Real
- Tesla Unveils First SUV: Model X
- New York Fashion Week Hits the Runway as Colors Pop
- Greece Austerity Deal Runs Into Trouble Once Again
- Why Greece Will Default, Leave Eurozone
- Housing Still Hurting Consumers, Economy: Bernanke
- Get Ready for $5 Gas This Year: Ex-Shell CEO
- Diamond Investing: Why It's Not for the Faint of Heart
- Obama Backs Down on Birth Control Plan
- Israel Likely to Bomb Iran This Year: Political Analyst
- The World's Best Beers
- Users of Citibank Bill-Pay App Charged Twice
MOST SHARED
- How to Date a Wall Street Man
- Europe Shares End Lower, Hit by New Greek Concerns
- Unions Launch Strike in Greece
- 5 Hedge Funds’ Top Stocks Soar After 2011 Rout
- Bill Murray's View on the Economy
- The World's Best Beers
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- Spent Keurig K-Cups Filling Up U.S. Landfills
- Greece Austerity Deal Runs Into Trouble Once Again
- Jobs You Can Do Forever
An Open Letter to the Ron Paul Faithful
Editor's Note:
Dear folks,
You guys are good. Real good. You are truly a force on World Wide Web and I tip my hat to you.
That's based on my first hand experience of your work regarding our CNBC Republican candidate debate. After the debate, we put up a poll on our Web site asking who readers thought won the debate. You guys flooded it.
Now these Internet polls are admittedly unscientific and subject to hacking. In the end, they are really just a way to engage the reader and take a quick temperature reading of your audience. Nothing more and nothing less. The cyber equivalent of asking the room for a show of hands on a certain question.
So there was our after-debate poll. The numbers grew ... 7,000-plus votes after a couple of hours ... and Ron Paul was at 75%.
Now Paul is a fine gentleman with some substantial backing and, by the way, was a dynamic presence throughout the debate , but I haven't seen him pull those kind of numbers in any "legit" poll. Our poll was either hacked or the target of a campaign. So we took the poll down.
The next day, our email basket was flooded with Ron Paul support messages. And the computer logs showed the poll had been hit with traffic from Ron Paul chat sites. I learned other Internet polls that night had been hit in similar fashion. Congratulations. You folks are obviously well-organized and feel strongly about your candidate and I can't help but admire that.
But you also ruined the purpose of the poll. It was no longer an honest "show of hands" -- it suddenly was a platform for beating the Ron Paul drum. That certainly wasn't our intention and certainly doesn't serve our readers ... at least those who aren't already in the Ron Paul camp.
Some of you Ron Paul fans take issue with my decision to take the poll down. Fine. When a well-organized and committed "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many," I get a little worried. I'd take it down again.
Sincerely,
Allen Wastler
Managing Editor, CNBC.com
Questions? Comments? Write to .
- Actor Clint Eastwood responds to critics over the Chrysler Super Bowl ad and all the controversy.
- Here’s a look at Westminster Kennel Club’s most successful breeds and how much they cost.
- When looking for that next career move, workers need to look at the differences between a start-up and a public firm.
- After enduring the recession, many Baby Boomers say money isn’t the most important thing they hope to leave to their kids.
- The ‘Fast Money’ traders weigh in on fashion related stocks from apparel to footwear to accessories and fragrances.
- Attention, online shoppers. The days of tax-free online shopping may be coming to an end in many states.










