- U.S. Stocks Rally for the Second Straight Week
- Dollar is Not Plunging—So 'Calm Down': Market Strategist
- Strategists Say Markets Have More Upside — But How Much?
- Hirschhorn: Risk-Averse Traders
- Roginsky: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Financial Reform
- This Year's Biggest Thanksgiving Leftover: Cash
- TV Series Inks Unique Deal For Fight
- First Time Buyers Rescue Housing: Realtors
- Dollar General Trades Higher After Its IPO
- China: Low US Interest Rates Threaten Recovery
- Hedge Fund Billionaire Paulson Reports New Citi Stake
- White House Plans to Freeze Spending to Cut Deficit
- Cramer: 5 Earnings Reports to Watch Next Week
- Court Rejects 'Clawbacks' for Alleged Stanford Victims
- Cities With the Most Home Price Reductions
- Tax Credit Sparking First-Time Home Sales: Realtors
- Investors Cut Back US Stocks for Bigger Growth Abroad
- This Year's Biggest Thanksgiving Leftover: Cash
MOST SHARED
- CNBC Video: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping American Great
- Today's Market Action
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Microsoft's Bill Gates Praises Apple's Steve Jobs For 'Saving the Company'
- CNBC TRANSCRIPT: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping America Great
- Inside Wal-Mart's Acai Berry Juice Maker
- Israel Going Green
- China's Role as Lender Alters Dynamics for United States
- Low Interest Rate Investing

What do Nokia, Conocophillips and MacDonalds have in common? If you said they were leaders in their respective fields, you’d be right of course. But that is only half the story.
All three are also considered by the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), as ethical and socially responsible companies, worthy of investing in.
How can a big oil company like Conocophillips be socially responsible you may ask? Or if you are a vegan, investing in MacDonalds’ stock and helping the fast food chain grow, is probably not on your priority list.
But, if the key criterion you are after is a demonstrated responsibility in a company's policies towards women, all three have top marks.
In this respect, investing in a company such as Conocophillips is unique, given that most socially responsible investment (SRI) funds focus on firms devoted to developing alternative energy and climate-friendly products. Most SRIs also avoid investing in companies with interest in alcohol, tobacco, chemistry or military technologies.
The Fund
UNIFEM and UOB Asset Management (UOBAM) launched the United Global UNIFEM Singapore Fund in 1999.
United Global UNIFEM Singapore Fund |
| Min. Investment | S$1000/US$1000 |
| Subscription Fee | 5% |
| Management Fee | 1.5 % per annum |
The UNIFEM Fund aims to achieve long-term investment returns by investing globally in companies that not only have excellent potential, but more importantly, also have non-discriminatory and women-friendly policies in place.
The fund also avoids companies that show a 'lack of commitment' in empowering women.
To ensure the yardsticks are met, a UNIFEM Advisory Committee works closely with UOBAM to determine if companies meet, and maintain these criteria. Every six months, the committee provides UOBAM with a list of companies that have consistently failed to meet the guidelines.
If a company on this list is on the current investment portfolio, UOBAM will take steps to remove it immediately.
UNIFEM says guidelines include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Significant female representation at the board level
- Women-friendly hiring and promotion programs
- Pro-maternity and/or adoption benefits
- Formal statements by the company, affirming equal pay for comparable work between men and women
- On-site or subsidized child-care programs for employees' children
- Mentoring programs for women staff
- Manufacture of products/services of benefit to women.
United Global UNIFEM Top 10 Holdings |
| Rank | Holding |
| 1 | Conocophillips |
| 2 | Nokia |
| 3 | Koninklikje |
| 4 | MacDonalds |
| 5 | Reckitt Benckiser |
| 6 | Total SA |
| 7 | IBM |
| 8 | Roche Holdings |
| 9 | ABB Ltd |
| 10 | Nestle |
*As of 31 August 2007 |
Not surprisingly, the UNIFEM Fund holds a broad range of stocks across a wide range of sectors. Its top ten company holdings range from oil, information technology and engineering, to financials, consumer plays and mobile firms.
Firms in the U.S. and Europe make up over 60% of the fund’s holdings. Japan accounts for about 6%.
![]() |
The Affair
For all its good intentions, the Fund has not been doing too well. According to Lipper, the UNIFEM Fund has underperformed against the MSCI All Country World Index, returning 10.29% against the index’s 13.26%.
Since its inception nearly eight years ago, NAV is at 0.32% compared to MSCI’s 2.41%
The underperformance is broadly in line with most SRIs in Asia. SRIs are new to Asia. According to Credit Agricole, the global market for ethical funds is worth about $4.2 trillion, with Asia accounting only for $2.5 billion.
"In the U.S. and European countries, SRI funds are outperforming as social and environment issues are well known, but we believe they will also track and outperform global indexes in Asia in the long run," says fund manager Kanise Chan.
In the U.K., the average return from ethical funds over the past three years is about 57 percent.
But the winds do appear to be changing in Asia. The Korea Times, citing fund evaluating firm Zeroin, reported that nine SRI funds with over one billion won ($1.1 million) of assets under management, showed returns similar to those of stock funds which have gained 45 percent over the past six months.
Melissa Brown, Executive Director at the Association for Sustainable & Responsible Investment in Asia says it is also critical to look at the structure of the fund. "SRIs are not a homogeneous asset class, some are growth funds, and others, like the UNIFEM fund, are value driven," says Brown.
Brown notes that given the fund’s stated goals of promoting women’s causes, investments will tend to consist of companies from developed countries, and these firms are more than likely to be stable, large cap companies with long histories of progressive human resource policies.
"These companies are usually not in highly cyclical industries like technology, where the focus is on growth and stock options, and where staff turnover is high. More likely, they have high staff retention rates, and manage their workforces with a longer term view," Brown adds.
Another important factor is the state of global equity markets. "In the current high liquidity environment, I’d be more worried if a growth fund underperforms, not a value fund," says Brown. "The fact is, globally, there is a segment of the population that wants to invest where their values lie, and are willing to take a longer view and accept some underperformance."
Ultimately though, fund managers and Brown alike recommend the same proven strategy when investing in ethical funds like the UNIFEM fund: Do your due diligence, and decide if the fund’s investment principles match your expectations (and expected returns).
And do not put all your eggs (free range or otherwise) in one basket. Fund managers recommend spreading them between a number of ethical funds and/or other funds to reduce damage to your portfolio if one underperforms.
Send us your questions and comments to us at .
- Warren Buffett and Bill Gates spoke to Columbia students, and Buffett made the students a startling offer.
- For the chief of cable company Comcast, growth has been about making deals – generally very large deals.
- Some companies may start using insurance to shift carbon risk from their balance sheets to maybe... yours?
- The president and founder of Genesis Today wants to improve America’s health, and thinks Wal-Mart can help.
- Switzerland's privacy watchdog is taking legal action to force Google to make changes to its Street View service.
- A wealthy, distracted Texas driver crashed his million-dollar Bugatti Veyron sports car into a salt marsh, say police.










