
- Top 20 European Stocks for Crisis Time: Strategist
- Curt Schilling’s Videogame Company Goes Bust
- Time for Flash Sales to Adapt or Die
- What Flash Sites Are Suggesting About Consumers
- Hewlett-Packard Faces a ‘Dogfight’ for Talent: Analyst
- Laouchez: Leadership in Financial Services — Missing in Action?
- DuckDuckGo Cooks Google’s Goose: Analyst
- Growing Sub-Prime Auto Loans - New Troubles for Automakers?
- General Electric’s $4.5 Billion Dividend Slated for Buybacks
- Both Campaigns Seize on Romney’s Years at Bain
- What Would Greek Exit Mean for the US Economy?
- Big European Funds Confirm Dumping Euro Assets
- Why Are Greek and Italian Politicians So Bad?
- Time for Flash Sales to Adapt or Die
- HMO Stocks May Struggle Over Health Claim Costs
- ECB Official: On Greece, ‘We Are Working on Plan A’
- Spain: Too Poor to Win a Singing Contest?
- China Counter-Challenges US Over Subsidies at WTO
MOST SHARED
- China Counter-Challenges US Over Subsidies at WTO
- What Would Greek Exit Mean for the US Economy?
- Heard in More US States: See You in Tax Court!
- Bankia Shares Suspended Ahead of Rescue Details
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Why Are Greek and Italian Politicians So Bad?
- Shares to Open Higher; Fears Over Greece Persist
- Spain: Too Poor to Win a Singing Contest?
- Markets: Out of Stock
- In Spain, Bank Transfers Reflect Broader Fears
Dems Debate: Did Hillary Open Door For Opponents?
![]() |
Hillary Clinton Secretary of State Hillary Clinton |
On a series of issues--Social Security, taxes, and most conspicuously immigration--the Democratic front-runner gave answers that seemed self-evidently designed to obscure rather than clarify her positions. Obama said she was displaying political savvy rather than the straight talk America needs; Edwards contrasted her various "primary mode" and "general election mode" postures with what he called the "truth-telling mode" that Democrats crave in the post-Bush political world.
By her answers, Clinton made those arguments stronger. And that puts one of her few obviously vulnerabilities in the center of the campaign table with two months to go before the critical test all candidates face in Iowa.
The debate was significant for another reason too: it illuminated the meaning of the "experience" Clinton is claiming as an advantage over her rivals. Unlike Edwards and Obama, Clinton came of age politically at a time when Democrats were desperately insecure about their ability to compete nationally against an ascendant GOP.
Her experience teaches that Democrats must guard zealously against giving Republicans targets for attack in a general election. Voting for tough talk on Iran and for the Iraq war five years ago, and refusing to be pinned down on taxes or Social Security all meet that test. Obama and Edwards came of age in a more confident Democratic era--ironically, the Bill Clinton era.
Their differences in this regard shouldn't be exaggerated. Edwards voted for the Iraq war too, after all, and Obama ducked from embracing the details of Rep. Charlie Rangel's tax overhaul bill just as Clinton did.
But now they have an opening that didn't exist 24 hours ago to make the most of those differences, such as they are. Does that turn the race upside down? Hardly. But at a point that might be regarded as that beginning of the bell lap, it's a race that all of a sudden looks more interesting.
Questions? Comments? Write to .
- The government wants help for its investigation into the mortgage backed security fiasco of 2008.
- Where do the happiest and most optimistic of Asian millionaires live? Click through to find out.
- These athletes are notable for brief moments in the sun and leaving their fame on the field.
- China has been ramping up investments around the world. Here’s a list of the top ten countries.
- Is there a Machiavellian scheme to create a United States of Europe? Patrick Allen looks into it.
- Now you can eat your way across America all year long, from one sizzling bacon festival to another.













