Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

Green Vs. Black ETFs

 Text Size  
Published: Wednesday, 7 Nov 2007 | 8:06 AM ET
By: By CNBC.com

How do you take your energy -- green or black?

The choices are not quite that simple yet, but with investors fixating on $100-a-barrel oil and CNBC taking an in-depth look at the green movement all this week, it’s worth asking the question: Which group is performing better in the market -- investments based on so-called clean or green energy or investments based on more traditional carbon-based technology, like oil and coal?

Given the growing popularity of exchange traded funds with investors and ETFs' capacity to reflect a broad swath of any sector, we thought they’d provide the most useful comparisons.

Green ETFs

  • Powershares WilderHill Clean Energy +46.71%
  • Market Vectors Global Alt Energy +43.36%
  • PowerShares WilderHill Progressive Energy +20.92%
  • Claymore / LGA Green +5.74%

Black ETFs

  • United States Oil Fund +45.70%
  • Oil Service HOLDRs +41.90%
  • Energy Select Sector +32.35%

Yes, that’s right, thus far on a year-to-date basis, green has a slight edge over black.

  Price   Change %Change
IPATH GC ---
MV OIL SVCS ---

-- Research by Ariel Nelson, CNBC

 Print
With investors fixating on $100-a-barrel oil and CNBC taking an in-depth look at the green movement all this week, it’s worth asking the question: Which group is performing better in the market?

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments: