- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Klutzy Woz Becomes Auto Body Pitchman
- Google Goes After Microsoft, Kind Of
- Flip Backfires on Cisco's John Chambers
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Dykstra Discusses Bankruptcy
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
RSS FEED

![]() |
Marc Andreessen |
And for the same reason Marc Andreessen became a "New Media Mogul" with Netscape, and more recently Opsware, he once again encapsulates an issue and offers a solution. He spells it all out on his own blog. His message comes in the shadow of Michael Eisner's ridiculous tirade earlier this week that writer's shouldn't be picketing the major studios, but picketing Apple Inc. since that company is at the heart of all these pesky distribution issues.
Andreessen's comments are as cogent as Eisner's are ludicrous, since Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
] might be doing more to save the entertainment industry than anyone else. He starts his blog setting the stage:
"So imagine you're a major media mogul....You're faced with a massive, once-in-a-lifetime shift in mainstream consumer behavior from traditional mass media....to new activities that you do not control: the Internet, social networking, user-generated content, mobile services, video games...Is this really the right time to pick a fight with the writers over royalties from DVD and Internet sales...?"
Studios do seem to agree that content is king--the crux of Hollywood's disdain for Apple's iTunes juggernaut. Yet, they won't offer writers a fair cut of new media distribution. If studios think they're adding value simply by aggregating the distribution, they're in for a rude awakening. Distribution is being ripped away from traditional gatekeepers, like the studios, and fast-becoming something far more democratized with artists appealing directly to fans. Just ask Radiohead, Nine Inch Nails, Madonna. They need writers more than writers need the studios.
Andreessen asks,
"If you're a mogul, the key question has to be, what would the founders of my industry have done in this situation? Thomas Edison, Darryl Zanuck, Jack Warner, Irving Thalber, Adolph Zukor, David Selznick, Louis Mayter, David Sarnoff, Bill Paley, Walt Disney...Would they have crawled into a hole of protecting the status quo or would they be forging a new, exciting, optimistic future through force of will and creativity?"
I say Bravo!
And this:
"If you, like me, are just a normal and normally happy consumer of TV shows and movies--at least when you're not equally happily playing video games, surfing the Internet, networking socially, blogging, or kicking it with your iPod--then one day your grandchildren are likely to ask you, 'Hey, old man, I learned in school today that there used to be these companies called 'studios', and they would actually spend tens or hundreds of millions of dollars making scripted entertainment, and you would actually sit still, in a chair, and watch it-- whatever happened to that?' And you'll get to say, 'Well, it's complicated, but let me tell you a little story about the writers' strike of 2007...' "
To which I, as a tech reporter and writer not repped by the Union, again say, "Bravo!"
Questions? Comments?







