- Kilduff: Expect Rebound In Oil Prices Early 2009
- How to Move Forward After a Layoff, Part 2
- Jobs Numbers: Breakdown by Sector
- Congress And Automakers: Long And Difficult "Marriage" Ahead
- Great Companies Come at Fair Prices
- Yoshikami: Investing & the Obama Presidency
- Wall of Shame: Fortress Investment's Wes Edens
- Cramer to Geithner: Let FDIC Chair Keep Her Job
- Lightning Round: Boeing, Medtronic, Agrium and More
- Bond Prices Get Boost From Jobs Plunge
- Economy Sheds 533,000 Jobs, Most in 34 Years
- Citigroup Sells German Arm for $6.7 Billion
- Charts Predict S&P Festive Rally Above 1,000
- BMW's Global Sales Plunge by a Quarter in Nov.
- What the Pros Say: S&P May Fall to 700
- Bleak Jobs Data Forecasts Add to Automakers' Woes
- Euro Shares Extend Fall after US Jobs Data
- European Stocks to Open Sharply Lower

A video made by the Writers Guild is circulating the web. As of now, it's been seen 111,000 times on Youtube. It dramatically argues that the studios are cashing in on digital distribution and the writers aren't getting a penny. It starts with Disney [DIS
Loading...
()
] CEO Bob Iger saying that Disney has about $1.5 billion in digital revenues. (I should point out--that it's a CNBC interview Iger, and it includes an interview I did with NBC TV chief Ben Silverman. Hey, isn't that copyright infringement?).
The writers are arguing that these companies are making boatloads of cash--showing Sumner Redstone saying that Viacom [VIA
Loading...
()
] will double its revenues this year from digital--and that there's no reason writers shouldn't have a piece of that. Take a look at the leaflet that writers are passing out bashing Disney:
![]() |
So, is it true? Well, not exactly. That $1.5 billion Bob Iger mentioned actually includes a lot of revenues that have nothing to do with writers--people booking trips to Disney resorts, etc. Iger should have said that $1.5 billion of their revenues are generated over the internet.
And this is the statement Disney issued in response:
"The WGA leadership is deliberately distorting the facts. As the WGA knows full well, more than half of Disney's digital revenues are from sales of travel packages and the vast majority of the rest is from online advertising on sites like Disney.com and ESPN.com and through online merchandise sales. The WGA also knows its members have been paid residuals on entertainment content downloaded via iTunes. Deliberately misleading the public is not the best way to resolve this issue and get Hollywood back to work."
So is the writers' premise true? Well, they do get a piece of digital sales like iTunes downloads. And Steve Jobs is keeping such a huge chunk of those revenues that perhaps they should be protesting.
The studios complain to me that they're getting killed on that download revenue and that's one reason many studios won't deal with Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
] . But I digress, the issue is whether the writers are getting adequately compensated for those ads next to streaming shows. This debate, however off base, is far more dramatic!
Questions? Comments?


