Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
More Videos
- Underwater Mortgages Could Sink Even Deeper
- First Time Buyers Rescue Housing: Realtors
- Housing Recovery 'Still In Uncharted Territory': HUD Secretary
- Shadow Inventory Dwarfs Loan Mods
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Watch Foreclosures, Seriously
- Home Buyer Tax Credit Expansion Heads to Obama
- Congratulations America, We're All Landlords Now
- Wells Fargo Bets on Housing Recovery
- Home Buyer Tax Credit Done: Does it Matter?
MOST SHARED
- Stocks Overvalued, Recession Will Return: Meredith Whitney
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Almost Doubles Wal-Mart Holdings During Summer
- U.S. May Wind Up Green With Envy
- BofA Ex-Counsel: I Was 'Stunned' When I Got Fired
- Time Warner to Spin Off AOL on December 9
- CNBC Video: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping American Great
- Solar Emerges From A Dark Period
- Stocks May Rise Further after Fed Waves on 'Risk Trade'
- Millions May Have to Repay Part of Obama Tax Credit
- Answers to Your Questions: A Path to Economic Disaster?
- 5 Ways to Play the Chinese Markets: Analyst
- Meredith Whitney: Turns Bearish
- 3 Stock Plays on Rising College Costs
- Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Almost Doubles Wal-Mart Holdings During Summer
- Nov. 16: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Getting to the Heart of the Merck-Abbott Embargo Break
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
- My Ratings on Lowe's & Home Depot: Analyst
- US Top Banks Warn Congress on 'Break-Up' Risks
- Stocks May Rise Further after Fed Waves on 'Risk Trade'
- Obama in China Grapples with Economic Strains
- Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Boosts Stake in Wal-Mart
- Microsoft Co-founder Allen Diagnosed with Cancer
- Time Warner to Spin Off AOL on December 9
- Gates Boosts Waste Management, Coca Cola Stakes
- US Cities With Most Underwater Mortgages
- What's Kept Stock Rally Going? Fear, Not Confidence
RSS FEED
Realty Check
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com photo composite |
] and Freddie [FRE
Loading...
()
] news from a good source of mine, mortgage consultant and former HUD official, Howard Glaser. What follows are this thoughts: Fan and Fred have been viewed as firewalled off from the core of the subprime crisis. They are the "heart and soul" of the housing market, with a market that is comprised of prime, conforming loan product. Fannie holds about 2% in subprime, Freddie may 4 or 5%. Although it is unrealistic to have expected Fan and Fred to be completely immune from the broader developments in housing finance (and indeed their CEOs have been warning of this for some time), the reality of their losses drives home with finality that the prime mortgage market has caught the infection.
And because Fan and Fred are the backbone of the housing finance system, the hits they take are more troubling than the impact, say of an investment bank taking mortgage losses. You expect Merrill to jump in and out of the mortgage markets and it really doesn't matter because despite the shift of the past five years the market doesn't rely on them. But Fannie and Freddie have to be there, they have to be healthy, they have to be a predictable source of mortgage capital and when they are not that is a sign of real illness in the markets.
That said, the immediate Freddie problem is less than it looks. The proximate cause may be the losses, but the losses would not be as consequential if it didn't impact capital. And the reason there is a capital impact is that the Freddie regulator put a 30% surcharge on Freddie (and Fannie) in response to the accounting problems 3 years ago. So the reason Freddie needs more capital is that regulators are requiring more capital....at Freddie's normal capital level they would not have to be out there hunting for money.
When taken in conjunction with the cap on the portfolio that the regulator has also put in place, the real world impact of all of this is that Freddie (and Fannie too) are unable to pump additional capital into the mortgage markets when those markets most need it. (And which was the hope of last resort for the market). Bottom line...in a kind of twisted way, Fannie and Freddie's own regulator has created the current crisis with the capital surcharge.
The Freddie development also puts into deep freeze Congressional attempts to raise the fannie/freddie loan limits and the portfolio cap. Just this past week, (Sen Charles) Schumer and others were working on passing these provisions. That will be over for a while.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes