Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- Commercial Conundrum
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Bank-owned Inventory: Move it!
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- Home Prices: Are We There Yet?
- Treasury: Jingle Mail A Myth
- How Bad Is The Housing Market? One Man's Tale
- Appraisal Code Sparks Huge Response
- New Rules on Home Appraisals End Up Thwarting Many Sales
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- The View From Newark
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Warren Buffett's Complete Sun Valley CNBC Interview - Transcript and Video
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- White House Weighing Assistance for Small Businesses
- How Serious Is White House About Second Stimulus?
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- It's Not the Wealthy Who Are Leaving California: Study
- Atlantic City Takes Hit as Pennsylvania Casino Opens
RSS FEED

![]() |
AP |
Well lets take those comments and put them next to the news of yesterday, which was that the Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, added a new proposal to his “freezer rate” plan:
Current law allows states and localities to issue tax-exempt bonds only to assist first time homebuyers or homebuyers in designated distressed areas…Today, we are proposing to allow state and local governments to temporarily broaden their tax-exempt bond programs to include mortgage refinancings; if enacted, this will reduce the cost of innovative mortgage programs and allow these programs to reach more struggling homeowners.
So when you start talking about tax-exempt bond programs, you start talking about taxpayer money, am I right? And here’s my other question: how are we not bailing out the lenders on this? If we’re bailing out the borrowers, well that in turn bails out the lenders, saves them from having to foreclose on all these homes at far greater expense.
All this talk of revamping Fannie[FNM
Loading...
()
] and Freddie [FRE
Loading...
()
] ? Well that’s just a direct line to Countrywide [CFC
Loading...
()
] because they’re the only people buying Countrywide’s loans right now. There is simply no credit market out there except F and F, and so if we raise the loan limits or raise the portfolio caps, then we’re just raising the amount of money that lenders like Countrywide can make.
Yes, this is a far more “complex” industry than we’ve had in the past, and that’s precisely why we’re in the pickle we’re in, because it got so complex that not only can no one understand it comprehensively, but no one knows how to fix it either, and I’m talking right up the food chain. Why haven’t we gotten any “details” on the Paulson plan, like how to designate which borrowers fall into which category, who gets the freeze, who gets the refi, who gets diddly? Because they just don’t know how to do it.
Oh, I know they’ll come up with some parameters at some point, but whatever they are they will likely be replete with loopholes and exceptions, and everyone and their brother will be looking to find one. Because if there are two things I do know for sure, it's that this industry is more “complex” than it we’ve had in the past, AND, given the chance to "screw" the government, most people will.
Questions? Comments?











