- Warren Buffett to CNBC: 'I Haven't Bought American Express In Years'
- CNBC Video: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping American Great
- U.S. Stocks Rally for the Second Straight Week
- Dollar is Not Plunging—So 'Calm Down': Market Strategist
- Strategists Say Markets Have More Upside — But How Much?
- Hirschhorn: Risk-Averse Traders
- Roginsky: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Financial Reform
- This Year's Biggest Thanksgiving Leftover: Cash
- TV Series Inks Unique Deal For Fight
- Stronger Yuan Needed for Global Rebalancing: IMF Chief
- Washington Not Trying to Contain China: Obama
- Japan Third Quarter GDP Jumps; 2010 Growth May Slow
- Quiz: How Much Do You Know About Green?
- Citi Rejects Terra Firma's Latest Bid to Save EMI: Report
- JP Morgan to Bid Over $3 Billion for Cazenove Stake
- Buffett: I Haven't Bought AMEX Shares in Years
- Bristol-Myers to Spin Off Mead Johnson Stock
- BlackRock: Central Banks To Be Net Buyers of Gold
MOST SHARED
- U.S. May Wind Up Green With Envy
- Warren Buffett to CNBC: 'I Haven't Bought American Express In Years'
- Japan Third Quarter GDP Jumps; 2010 Growth May Slow
- Taking a Page from Obama's Asia Agenda in Investing
- Sustainability Indices Sprouting Up
- For Investors, The New Green Looks To Be White
- The Cost of Thanksgiving Dinner 2009
- EADS Cautious on Full-Year Forecast after Earnings Dip
- Disaster Film '2012' Drowns Rivals at Box Office
- CNBC Video: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping American Great
Text Size 
 |
Richard Drew / AP Boone Pickens |
The state and federal government are willing to put money behind it because it's good for the environment. They say they'll spend hundreds of millions of dollars on what they are calling the San Pedro Bay Ports Clean Air Action Plan with the goal of cutting particulate matter pollution from all port sources by more than 50 percent within the next five years.
That's great. But what I care about is the cost. After all, it isn't a viable energy alternative if it costs more to use it, because then no one will use it (without government subsidies, also known as my tax dollars). Clean Energy says if you use natural gas in a vehicle, it costs 10-15 percent less to go the same distance versus gasoline. In fact, we spoke to some cab drivers here in New York who have natural gas taxis and they agreed, and some cases had even better luck.
The problem of course is the infrastructure. Clean Energy operates natural gas filling stations in California, Colorado, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Washington, Wyoming, British Columbia and Ontario, and a liquid natural gas plant in Willis, Texas. The focus is fleets of vehicles, not you and me. Their customers include Los Angeles International Airport, Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, SuperShuttle, Foothill Transit, Waste Management, Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport, Sysco Foods, Denver International Airport and the U.S. Navy.
It's an interesting idea. Especially because, according to AAA, if you normalize a gallon of ethanol for how far it takes you versus a gallon of gas, E85 will cost you $3.12 per gallon. They peg a gallon of gas at $2.99 today. I'm not sure Americans love the environment 13 cents more per gallon.
Questions? Comments? energysource@cnbc.com
- Where, what, how.
- Warren Buffett and Bill Gates spoke to Columbia students, and Buffett made the students a startling offer.
- For the chief of cable company Comcast, growth has been about making deals – generally very large deals.
- Some companies may start using insurance to shift carbon risk from their balance sheets to maybe... yours?
- The president and founder of Genesis Today wants to improve America’s health, and thinks Wal-Mart can help.
- Switzerland's privacy watchdog is taking legal action to force Google to make changes to its Street View service.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes