Al Behrman / AP Patrons line up for fuel, Tuesday, May 30, 2006, in Cincinnati. Oil prices rose above $72 a barrel Tuesday ahead of an OPEC meeting in Venezuela and the start of the Atlantic hurricane season later this week. The Memorial Day holiday marked the beginning of the peak driving season in the U.S., a period when energy traders are extra skittish about any loss of oil production or refining capacity. (AP Photo/Al Behrman)

As I watched the signing ceremony for another energy bill today, I thought, why bother? The push for more ethanol only seems to drive up the price of corn, displace other crops, and lead to food inflation for consumers.

Energy independence? Please. We import roughly half the oil we use each day. That's a pretty big hurdle to independence.

But then I read John Cassidy's article in Portfolio. He thinks oil prices are headed back to $50. Sound crazy? I thought so. But then I read on. He points out that yes, the easy oil is gone, but in the end, market forces HAVE to work.

High prices have been in place long enough to motivate integrated oil companies to reinvest in exploration and production. Consumers have experienced pain at the pump long enough to take a hard look at more fuel efficient cars.

The government is investing in new technology (this is where I reluctantly note the latest energy bill.) And they aren't alone. When I asked Energy Secretary Sam Bodman about the push for ethanol in the face of higher corn prices (see video clip), he pointed to private companies who are putting more and more money into research of cellulosic ethanol to avoid using expensive corn.

All these forces may be slow to get going, but they are just as hard to stop. That's what makes the $50 case intriguing. Remember how much oil was sloshing around the market in the 80's when crude threatened to drop below $10 a barrel?

If there were anyway to shut the tap at that point, everyone losing their shirt from Texas to the Middle East would have pitched in to do it. It's hard to imagine $50 crude today. But would you have bet on $99 three years ago?

Questions?  Comments?  energysource@cnbc.com

Tools:

PrintEmail

Next Post

Previous PostBack to Main Page

• 

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

» More: Blogs | Slideshows | Special Reports | Top Video

• 

• Buffett & Gates Talk At Columbia 

• Warren Buffett and Bill Gates spoke to Columbia students, and Buffett made the students a startling offer.

• 

• The Roberts Way 

• For the chief of cable company Comcast, growth has been about making deals – generally very large deals.

• GE Talks Go Slowly 

• 

• Carbon Insurance 

• Some companies may start using insurance to shift carbon risk from their balance sheets to maybe... yours?

• 

• Acai In The Big Box 

• The president and founder of Genesis Today wants to improve America’s health, and thinks Wal-Mart can help.

• 

• Swiss Sue Google 

• Switzerland's privacy watchdog is taking legal action to force Google to make changes to its Street View service.

• 

• Bugatti in the Drink 

• A wealthy, distracted Texas driver crashed his million-dollar Bugatti Veyron sports car into a salt marsh, say police.

COMMENTS

More Comments

 

« First | « Previous

Next » | Last »

Thank you for joining our discussion. Your comment has been posted.

ADD COMMENTS

Please Sign In or Register to participate.

In order to add a comment you must click here and accept our terms and conditions.

Edit Screen Name

Please sign-in/optin or register to be able to submit comments.

Remaining characters

CNBC welcomes your contribution. Please respect our community and the integrity of its participants. CNBC reserves the right to moderate and approve your comment.

PREVIEW COMMENT

Your comments have not been posted yet.
Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments: