- Stocks For Your Radar
- Legg Mason’s Miller Is Wrong
- Viacom's Paramount Sued for Misrepresentation
- Auto Bailout May Save Big 3 But No Help For Advertisers
- See What People Are Saying About... Gas Prices
- Sears: Raising Prices Only To Mark Them Down?
- Ok, What's All This About FSU "Inventing" Gatorade?
- Mortgage Applications Up, But Are They 'Real'?
- Hot Options Trading: What It Says for SanDisk
- Investment Advice: Time to Play the Fundamentals
- 'Bottom's Been Made' in Stocks: Legg Mason's Miller
- CyberMonday Spending Rises 15%: ComScore
- Fed's Beige Book: Economy Falls Deeper Into Recession
- Beige Book: Summary
- Pros Say: Fed Moves Can Kill Recession
- Bally Files For Bankruptcy Again, Up For Sale
- PC Forecast Cut for '09, Sales Seen Down 5.3%
- BoE Seen Slashing Rates to 2% as Economy Dives

![]() |
It's one more sign that the economy is slowing if not contracting. And it doesn't really matter which in the oil pits. Anything other than expansion means demand won't continue to gallop ahead of production and perhaps triple digit oil is overblown.
And speaking of demand, the EIA's Short Term Energy Outlook for January pounds another nail into the energy bulls coffins. Gasoline demand in the fourth quarter of 2007 fell flat compared to a year ago. That hasn't happened for seven years!
Click for related content |
For so long, we have endured the argument: "people are driving to work, to soccer practice… it's impossible to put on the breaks when Americans are going to places they must go." Perhaps not. And certainly if stores sell less merchandise, there's less energy guzzling production and shipping happening.
Calls, like Jeff Rubin's at CIBC World Markets, echo through the markets far less frequently these days. He thinks we'll see $150 oil in the next five years, along with $4.50 a gallon gas. That doesn't sound far fetched, just far off in the future.
The big sign post in the road now will be the government GDP number for the fourth quarter of 2007. That comes on January 30th and if it's a small number, or dare I say, a negative one, crude's slide may have only just begun.
Questions? Comments? energysource@cnbc.com



