Tech Check
More Videos
MOST SHARED
- Marc Faber: 100% Chance of Global Recession
- Time for Flash Sales to Adapt or Die
- How to Trade on the Jobs Report
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- Don’t Trust Buybacks
- Buy Broken Stocks, Not Broken Companies
- The Biggest Market Myth There Is?
- Facebook: The Song — Yes, We're Serious
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Buying the Right Sell-Off Stocks
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- Sticker Shock: What College Is Likely to Cost in 18 Years
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- Icahn Raises Stake in Chesapeake, Wants Board Seats
- Marc Faber: Chance of Global Recession Is Now 100%
- Week Ahead: Europe Has Wall Street Bull on Short Leash
- What Happened to Stocks? Most Unloved in 50 Years
- Cool Jobs: From Gold Stacker to Bed Tester
- Many Greeks Moved Their Money Abroad Long Ago
RSS FEED
Yahoo: Just "Sober Up" And Take The Money
Text Size 
Silicon Valley Bureau Chief
 |
CNBC.com |
Which brings me to Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] . If the market says you're worth $20 a share, and your stock sits there, bouncing around in a fairly narrow range, but trending lower quarter after quarter, and touches a four year low, it's not because a single investor says the stock is worth $20 a share. It's the entire market that has determined the value. So Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] steps up and offers a Rupert Murdoch-like 62 percent premium over that price. And shares quickly scamper upward, toward that offer price, as the market, once again, determines the value of Yahoo's shares.
Yet in the midst of all these voices ascribing a value to Yahoo shares, agreeing on what these shares are worth, there's one lone voice disagreeing, and declaring that the markets have gotten it wrong; that Microsoft has gotten it wrong; that investment bankers and analysts have gotten it wrong. That Yahoo isn't worth $20 a share; or even $31 a share; or $35 a share. The lone voice declaring Yahoo is worth a whopping $40 a share or more, is--drumroll please: Yahoo!
Which leads me back to the "drunk" metaphor I opened with. Drunk with power, fleeting as it might be; drunk with delusions; drunk with ego. Drunk.
Yahoo released a letter this morning formally rejecting Microsoft's $44.6 billion offer saying the bid "substantially undervalues" the company. No surprise there. This is a negotiation. You'd expect the acquiree to do what it can to get the offer-price up. But as I've written earlier, there's a fine line between fiduciary responsibility to get a bid up, and running the risk of losing the offer all together because of ego.
The fact is, Yahoo shares plummeted by 40 percent in the quarter leading up to the Microsoft offer; and Yahoo's board feels Microsoft is taking advantage of the situation by low-balling a price. But it isn't Microsoft's fault that Yahoo couldn't get its act together and keep its share price propped up; it certainly isn't Microsoft's fault that it waited for Yahoo to become a dying-on-the-vine property before making its bid. And let's not forget: it's hard to classify Microsoft's bid as a "low-ball offer" when it's a 62 percent premium over the price Yahoo shares traded at the day the offer was announced.
There are rumors that Yahoo is trying to strike a deal to buy AOL. Or buy AOL and outsource its search business to Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] . Or look for a new partner? Or maybe something else. What amazes me is the level of "scrambling" that seems to be going on inside Yahoo now. My question is, where was all the scrambling before the Microsoft deal was made public?
Where was the scrambling following Terry Semel's dismissal/departure last year? Where was the scrambling as Yahoo shares spiraled south? Did it take a hostile bid from Microsoft to light a fire under their collective butts? Because if that's the case, it's just tragic that Yahoo either didn't accept the magnitude of its problems, wasn't aware of them, or simply ignored them. But that's what it seems.
In its letter this morning, all three paragraphs of it, Yahoo says the Board of Directors is "continually evaluating all of its strategic options in the context of the rapidly evolving industry environment and we remain committed to pursuing initiatives that maximize value for all stockholders." But the company runs the risk of dithering through another major development happening right now, and being unable to act because it once again is plagued and paralyzed by indecision and slow reaction. The same thing happened in its competition with Google and Google ate Yahoo's lunch and stuck it with the bill.
Yahoo, you're drunk. Have a cup of coffee, sober up, wait for the Microsoft counter, and take the money and run. Your leverage evaporated as your stock slid. There's no shame in taking a $45 billion deal.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
