Skip navigation
MOST POPULAR RELATED TAGS
  • TOPICS
  • SECTORS
  • COMPANIES
 

  Current Housing Indicators
CURRENTPREVIOUS
Existing Home Sales4.49m4.74m
New Home Sales309,000344,000
Housing Starts583,000477,000
Building Permits547,000531,000
HMI9UNCH9
Existing Home Prices$170,300▼ (annually)$199,800
New Home Prices$201,100▼ (annually)$232,400
 
Realty Check Video Gallery
CNBC's Diana Olick has the latest real estate headlines.
Discussing whether home prices will go up in 2010, with Kenneth Rosen, UC Berkeley Haas School of Business; Matthew Garr...
 
HOMEBUILDERS TOP 10 INDEX
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

REALTY CHECK VIDEO

» More

Current DateTime: 03:47:54 16 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30871294
Expiration DateTime: 11/16/2009 3:48:34 PM

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 03:47:55 16 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30871303
powered by digg

Realty Check

Text Size
Feb.12
3:00 PM ET
Tuesday, 12 Feb 2008
Paulson's "New" Housing Plan Just To "Save" Market And Investors?

Henry Paulson
AP
Henry Paulson

Another day, another press conference from Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to announce another addendum to the “Hope Now” initiative to save troubled borrowers. I have to say I came away from this one scratching my head a bit more than usual.

Today’s “Project Lifeline” (who names this stuff?) gives borrowers who are about to lose their homes thirty more days to try to work something out. My question is why did we need a press conference and a title to do something that lenders should probably be doing in the first place.

I’ve been hearing from a lot of folks on the front lines of so-called “modifications” and “workouts” that one of the biggest impediments to success is the sheer volume of people requesting help and the lack of resources and time. So now they get 30 more days. Ok.

But then I have this other problem, and that is the moral limit to all this. It seems like every day we hear about a new plan to “help” more borrowers stay in homes that are far above their economic means.

I was a little taken aback today when I put the question to the Secy. Paulson:

Me: Where in your mind is the moral limit to all this?

Paulson: We’ve never argued that this will help everyone or that it should. You’ve heard me describe the fast track modification process as a way to prevent a market failure.

Yep, in all that talk about saving the “silent suffering” the fact is, that this is a way to save the housing market and all the investors who bought into mortgage-backed securities.

I’m not arguing whether that’s right or wrong, I’d just like everyone to start saying what this actually is: a mortgage market that invented some dicey, dare I say, faulty products and a whole bunch of borrowers who bought into those products, some knowingly and some unknowingly, without choosing to look at all the “what ifs” involved.

Questions?  Comments? 

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Tools:
PrintEmailAdd This share icon
Next Post
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:12:16 16 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 10:28:53 16 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 03:29:42 16 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 10:42:55 16 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters