- Nothing About New Cars Excites You? Are You Kidding?
- Chrysler's Fall: Could It Go Down To Number 6?
- Auto Sales: Flat For The Next Year And A Half?
- Gasoline is Dropping; Are SUVs Ready to Roll?
- SUV Market Bottomed? Nope!
- Toyota Outlook: Strength Through Hybrids -- And Electric
- Hell No! Hell Yes! Bailout Plan Fires Up Emotions
- Honda's Fit: Can It Crush Chrysler?
- The Big 3 DO Need Federal Help
- $10,000 Discounts -- But No Buyers

![]() |
CNBC.com |
The good news? The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's latest crash tests found 8 of 9 mid-size SUVs earned a "Good" rating in front end collisions. That's a big improvement from the Institutes last test in 2001 where only half the mid-size sport utes rated "Good."
The bad news? For the first time, the Institute tested side and rear-impact crash protection, and automakers have to make their sport utes perform better. Especially in rear-impact, where only 2 of 9 got a "Good" rating.
related content |
The institute's top pick is the Nissan Murrano, while the HUMMER tests raise troubling questions. The H3 earned acceptable ratings for front and side crash tests, and a poor rating for rear impact. Makes you wonder about the perception many have of the HUMMER as being a virtual tank on the road that will always protect you.
Now, the automakers point out their SUVs pass government crash tests and meet safety standards. That's true. But these tests make me realize that as far as these mid-size sport ute's have come safety wise, there's still plenty of room for improvement.
Here's the link to the study if you missed it up top.
Questions? Comments?





