More Videos
- 3D's Tipping Point and Your Living Room
- Silicon Valley and Hollywood Now Fast Friends
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- U.S. Stocks Fall on Dubai Worries
- Black Friday at Best Buy
- Strategists on Dubai: Avoid 'Rash Moves' Now
- Longer Lines, Fuller Carts This Black Friday
- Dubai Stock Market Fear Has 'Legs': Dennis Gartman
- Obama's Emission Reduction Pledge Paints Future for Autos
- Is Super Bowl Halftime Act Too Old?
- Surprising Options Trades in TiVo Shares
- EA Sports Hopes to Pump Up Sales Through Pop-Up Locations
- Dubai's Debt Woes Signal New Era for Creditors
- US Treasury Wants Banks to Do More to Ease Mortgages
- Fed Audit Would Hurt Economic Prospects: Bernanke
- Next Week: Cash In Now Or Wait For A Santa Rally?
- Dubai Stock Selloff May Bring Buying Opportunity
- Black Friday Sales Rise by 0.5%: ShopperTrak
- Longer Lines, Fuller Carts This Black Friday
- Big US Banks May Be Forced to Raise Capital: Bove
- Bank of America Amends Pay for Senior Executives
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
It's the latest salvo fired by the EU as it tries to come up with a way to rein in Microsoft's [MSFT
Loading...
()
] predatory behavior in an ongoing case that dates back years. All of this stems from Microsoft's failure to come up with what the EU says is "reasonable" royalty rates it charges competitors so they can license the technology they need to develop new products that would be compatible with Microsoft's Windows. In other words, the EU charges that Microsoft created a monopoly on the desktop by owning the operating system, and then charges exorbitant fees to software developers looking to create programs that will work with Microsoft's products.
It's an old saw, to be sure, and while the fine will generate big headlines by its sheer size, it is merely the latest in a very long list of patent and ant-trust settlements and fines from the world's biggest software maker. First, it was the $750 million Microsoft paid then-AOL/Time-Warner in 2003, stemming from Microsoft's push onto the internet and its destruction of Netscape. Then, a year later, $536 million to Novell [NOVL
Loading...
()
] and another $1.6 billion to Sun Microsystems [JAVA
Loading...
()
] . There was the $775 million paid to IBM in 2005; $1 billion to Real Networks; the $1.1 billion paid to the state of California. And the list goes on.
The fact is, any one of these settlements would be a big deal on their own. But they become a huge deal out of the sheer volume of settlement checks Microsoft has written. Break the law, make your billions, and wait for prosecutors and plaintiffs' attorneys to catch up with you later when the settlement you'll write--or the fine you'll pay--will likely be only a fraction of the revenue you generated along the way. Cost of doing business, plain and simple.
And you'd think such a big fine as the one announced today by the EU would be a public relations black eye for Microsoft. Yet the company has done this so many times that we're almost numb to it. So what. Another big fine that doesn't even come close to measuring up to the profits Microsoft has banked along the way.
Even worse, such a "big" fine really isn't all that big at all: the $1.35 billion Microsoft will have to pay works out to about two weeks of free cash flow for the company! That's not even a slap on the wrist. It's a traffic ticket. The real news here will be what, if anything, the EU decides to do next. And with more and more software moving online, it's not really clear the EU can do much since Microsoft will be able to reach its customers directly on the internet. Makes it hard for the EU to curb the company's business practices with the net acting as great equalizer.
Microsoft will make a call down to petty cash and move on.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes