- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Klutzy Woz Becomes Auto Body Pitchman
- Google Goes After Microsoft, Kind Of
- Flip Backfires on Cisco's John Chambers
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Dykstra Discusses Bankruptcy
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
RSS FEED

![]() |
CNBC.com |
It's the latest salvo fired by the EU as it tries to come up with a way to rein in Microsoft's [MSFT
Loading...
()
] predatory behavior in an ongoing case that dates back years. All of this stems from Microsoft's failure to come up with what the EU says is "reasonable" royalty rates it charges competitors so they can license the technology they need to develop new products that would be compatible with Microsoft's Windows. In other words, the EU charges that Microsoft created a monopoly on the desktop by owning the operating system, and then charges exorbitant fees to software developers looking to create programs that will work with Microsoft's products.
It's an old saw, to be sure, and while the fine will generate big headlines by its sheer size, it is merely the latest in a very long list of patent and ant-trust settlements and fines from the world's biggest software maker. First, it was the $750 million Microsoft paid then-AOL/Time-Warner in 2003, stemming from Microsoft's push onto the internet and its destruction of Netscape. Then, a year later, $536 million to Novell [NOVL
Loading...
()
] and another $1.6 billion to Sun Microsystems [JAVA
Loading...
()
] . There was the $775 million paid to IBM in 2005; $1 billion to Real Networks; the $1.1 billion paid to the state of California. And the list goes on.
The fact is, any one of these settlements would be a big deal on their own. But they become a huge deal out of the sheer volume of settlement checks Microsoft has written. Break the law, make your billions, and wait for prosecutors and plaintiffs' attorneys to catch up with you later when the settlement you'll write--or the fine you'll pay--will likely be only a fraction of the revenue you generated along the way. Cost of doing business, plain and simple.
And you'd think such a big fine as the one announced today by the EU would be a public relations black eye for Microsoft. Yet the company has done this so many times that we're almost numb to it. So what. Another big fine that doesn't even come close to measuring up to the profits Microsoft has banked along the way.
Even worse, such a "big" fine really isn't all that big at all: the $1.35 billion Microsoft will have to pay works out to about two weeks of free cash flow for the company! That's not even a slap on the wrist. It's a traffic ticket. The real news here will be what, if anything, the EU decides to do next. And with more and more software moving online, it's not really clear the EU can do much since Microsoft will be able to reach its customers directly on the internet. Makes it hard for the EU to curb the company's business practices with the net acting as great equalizer.
Microsoft will make a call down to petty cash and move on.
Questions? Comments?







