Realty Check
Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
#DIANAOLICK ON TWITTER
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Huge Spike in Home Prices Is Not Real
- Investor Caution: Beware of Heat in Distressed Housing
- Foreclosures Move East as Hardest-Hit Markets Clear
- Foreclosures Fall...And That's a Bad Thing?
- After a Dip, Homebuilder Sentiment Surges Again
- Obama’s ‘Responsible’ Reno Homeowners: Are They?
- Mortgage Market Still Hampers Housing Recovery
- Bank of America Offers Principal Reductions to 200,000 Homeowners
- Short Sales: Necessary Compromise or Scamming the System?
MOST SHARED
- Marc Faber: 100% Chance of Global Recession
- Zero China Growth Is ‘Probable’: Gordon Chang
- Time for Flash Sales to Adapt or Die
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- 5 Spots Where the Dollar Buys a Great Vacation
- Facebook: The Song — Yes, We're Serious
- How to Trade on the Jobs Report
- China Growth Risks Signal Need for Fiscal Action
- What College Tuition Will Look Like in 18 Years
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- Sticker Shock: What College Is Likely to Cost in 18 Years
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- Icahn Raises Stake in Chesapeake, Wants Board Seats
- Marc Faber: Chance of Global Recession Is Now 100%
- Week Ahead: Europe Has Wall Street Bull on Short Leash
- What Happened to Stocks? Most Unloved in 50 Years
- Cool Jobs: From Gold Stacker to Bed Tester
- Many Greeks Moved Their Money Abroad Long Ago
RSS FEED
Appraisers And Changing The System: What Took So Long?
CNBC Real Estate Reporter
![]() |
Andrew Cuomo |
This morning NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo announced a deal with Fannie and Freddie and OFHEO to change the way the whole appraisal system works. No question, this is a good thing. Over-inflated appraisals fuelled unsustainable price appreciation during the housing boom, and those appraisals are, I believe, at least 80 percent to blame for the current predicament the credit market is in.
Lenders, brokers, bankers, etc. pressured appraisers to raise the value of homes so that deals would go through and mortgages would be made for ridiculous amounts. I recently interviewed a high-level appraiser who told me this was totally commonplace, that appraisals during the boom were about as real as the hairy three-eyed monster that lurks in my son’s closet, and very much more dangerous.
Under the new agreement, Fannie [FNM
Loading...
()
] and Freddie [FRE
Loading...
()
] will not buy loans from brokers who select their own appraisers or lenders who use in-house appraisers or lenders who use appraisal management companies that they own or control. The deal also sets up the “Independent Valuation Protection Institute,” which will monitor the new deal (or “code” as it seems to be called). Fannie and Freddie will pay $24 million to set that up. The Institute will have a hotline for consumers and appraisers alike, it will report publicly on its activities and appoint a board of directors.
My question is: Why did it take the NY State Attorney General to do this? Why did Federal regulators allow these practices to go on commonplace for so long? I can’t imagine Fannie and Freddie wanted to spend all this money to do this, but clearly they had to fix the appraisal market themselves, since regulators wouldn’t. Good for them for agreeing to it and taking a stand, no matter how painful!
Result? A good consultant source of mine, Howard Glaser, says: “The agreement will result in growth of a new sector -- the independent appraisal management company. Companies which have large affiliated appraisal units will have to consider spinning those units off.”
In any case, it may be late, but it’s a step in the right direction.
Questions? Comments?












