- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- Singh Not Wearing Stanford At Tournament
- Companies Behind Murray Have a Lot To Gain
- Hall Of Fame Suit Lists Revealing Numbers
- Sports Poker Event Trying To Buck Recession
- Billy Mays — He Left the World Knowing He Sold It
- NBA Draft: By The Numbers
- Vijay Singh Offers To Pay Stanford's Bail
- Is "The Big Pierogi" Next For Shaq?
- Singh Will Continue To Stick By Stanford
RSS FEED
SPORTS BIZ VIDEO GALLERY
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- 'We're in the Middle of a Crash': Black Swan
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- Latvian Banker Taking Souls as Collateral
- The Worst Expected 2010 State Budget Gaps
- Cuddle Parties Heat Up
- Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Will Resign
- Best Cities For New Grads
- Fireworks At Pharma's Market
- Value of Warren Buffett's Annual Gift to Gates Foundation Falls Along With Berkshire's Stock
- Michael Jackson: The Music And The Money
- Five Stock Picks for This Market
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- Weak Dollar Means Gold at $1,040: Strategist
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- Alcoa to Post Loss — What Does This Mean?
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- Top Videos: From the Black Swan to the Bond King

- Obama Plan Would Trim Back Financial Powerhouses
- Biden: 'We Misread How Bad The Economy Was'
- FedEx Sees Signs of a Turnaround: Report
- Property Tax Appeals Take Toll on Governments
- Chrysler Names Remaining Directors to New Board
- Car Dealer Determined To Fight Chrysler Over Franchise

![]() |
Source: sportshubla.com Sam Cassell |
Why no love for the green team from Beantown? Because when they look at the Celtics, they only see red--as in a financial loss.
That's not good considering the folks in Vegas are coming off a $2.6 million loss from the Super Bowl shocker. It was only the second time Vegas has lost money on the game--they lost $400,000 in 1995.
Here's the deal. When the lines were set before the season started, Some bookmakers had the Celtics as high as 70-to-1 (Internet sites apparently reached 100-to-1). As I've come to learn, this is about as much of a longshot as a big city team can be.
You see, No matter how bad a team is, bookmakers are keen to limit their exposure of teams that figure to get action every year. The Celtics are one of those teams.
Then came Kevin Garnett and the odds plummeted. As of last night, before any factoring of Cassell occurred, the Celtics were at 5-to-2 odds to win it all. And if the NBA finals are a rematch of the Celtics-Lakers, which is clearly a possibility given Kobe's scoring and a return of Andrew Bynum, then there's no team that can bail out the folks in Vegas.
The rekindling of a rivalry that started to fizzle after the two last played in the finals 21 years ago is not ideal, to say the least.
The Lakers, who opened at 30-to-1 are now at 3-to-1.
Questions? Comments?











