More Videos
SPECIAL REPORT
MOST SHARED
- The Executive Job Search
- Chinese Overcapacity is Worsening, EU Chamber Warns
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- Salvation Army's Kettles Now Credit Card-Ready
- US Mint to Suspend American Eagle Gold 1-Ounce Coins
- Activision Prepares to Double Dip on ‘Modern Warfare 2’
- Black Friday: Bargain or Bust?
- Wal-Mart Price Pressure Hurts China Workers: Report
- Topless Business Is Taking Off
- 4 Thanksgiving Week Buys For Your Portfolio: Market Pros
- There's a 'Great Chance' For a Double-Dip Recession: Strategist
- Revenge of the Gangsta Nerds
- Will TCU See The "Flutie Effect?"
- Retail Earnings and Sales to Improve in Q4: Analyst
- Consumers Catching the Holiday Spirit
- It's Beginning To Look A Lot More Riskless
- Crescenzi: Claims Level Suggests End to Job Losses
- Hedge Funds Take Early Lead in Warren Buffett's 'Big Bet'
- China Overcapacity Worsening, EU Chamber Warns
- Investing in Good Karma – and Making a Profit
- Black Friday to Avoid Red Ink; Greenback Gets the Blues
- Bankruptcies Jump, Hitting Highest Level in Four Years
- Steepest Black Friday Discounts, Revealed
- Fed to Counsel Moviegoers on How to Use Credit Cards
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- US Mint to Suspend American Eagle Gold 1-Ounce Coins
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
PHARMA'S MARKET VIDEO
RSS FEED
Pharma's Market
Text Size 
I've blogged many times about the embargoes imposed by scientific groups and medical journals. If a media outlet breaks one -- something I have not done -- they risk losing the "privilege" of receiving the info ahead of time. And there's been a recent example of a prominent doctor who spoke too soon and has been barred for a while from publishing and reviewing studies in a peer-reviewed journal. Well, now at least one organization may take the enforcement a step further.
Reuters broke the story that three research analysts -- one at Merrill Lynch, another at Natexis Bleichroeder and the third at JPMorgan -- issued reports earlier this week with embargoed data from the upcoming American Academy of Neurology conference.
Two of the research notes to clients were about an experimental Alzheimer's drug from Baxter [BAX
Loading...
()
]. And the other note focused on the MS drug Tysabri from BIIB [BIIB
Loading...
()
] and ELN [ELN
Loading...
()
].
Reuters says the JPM and Natexis reports were retracted or recalled and that Merrill declined to comment.
But a spokesperson for the AAN says the recall or retraction may not be sufficient and that the organization could possibly try to take some kind of legal action. Here's their statement:
“The American Academy of Neurology is disappointed that representatives of financial organizations have deliberately violated the Academy’s embargo policy. The violation has been referred to the Academy’s General Counsel who is currently exploring all options available to the Academy.”
The embargo issue keeps cropping up for the organizations and journals that are trying to protect their "scientific integrity" and potentially headline-making content while servicing the companies that often sponsor the research (and the conferences) and in which Wall Street has a vested interest.
It will once again be put to the test over the next couple of months when the most widely-followed conference by doctors, scientists, investors, reporters and analysts--the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting--employs a new policy this year with some of its data to try to satisfy everyone.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes