Skip navigation
MOST POPULAR RELATED TAGS
  • TOPICS
  • SECTORS
  • COMPANIES
 

  Current Housing Indicators
CURRENTPREVIOUS
Existing Home Sales4.49m4.74m
New Home Sales309,000344,000
Housing Starts583,000477,000
Building Permits547,000531,000
HMI9UNCH9
Existing Home Prices$170,300▼ (annually)$199,800
New Home Prices$201,100▼ (annually)$232,400
 
Realty Check Video Gallery
Whether the nation is seeing a bottom in housing, with Jim LaCamp, MacroPortfolio Advisors; Steve Forbes, Forbes; Andy B...
CNBC's Diana Olick has the numbers on the sales of existing homes.
 
HOMEBUILDERS TOP 10 INDEX
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

REALTY CHECK VIDEO

» More

Current DateTime: 07:13:42 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30871294
Expiration DateTime: 11/23/2009 7:15:34 PM

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 07:13:42 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30871303
powered by digg

Realty Check

Text Size
Mar.05
2:38 PM ET
Wednesday, 5 Mar 2008
My Rage: Bernanke and Borrowers' Principal/Principle

Ben Bernanke
Dennis Cook / AP
Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke

I’m enraged. Yep. And I get to be enraged, because this is a blog, which is where I get to move away from being an unbiased reporter for a few moments each morning and offer an opinion.

Yesterday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a speech to bankers in Orlando, Fla., said that the best way out of the foreclosure mess is not to modify all these delinquent loans but to actually reduce the principal. He reasons that all these folks with negative equity in their homes have no reason to keep paying mortgages.

“In this environment, principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner may be a relatively more effective means of avoiding delinquency and foreclosure than reducing the interest rate,” said Mr. Bernanke.

Here goes: What kind of principle is that?? Is he actually saying that we need to give borrowers some incentive to stay in their homes, the homes that they signed on the dotted line to pay for?? Are we to reward thousands of borrowers for making bad business decisions, taking on far too much risk and not reading the fine print of their biggest investment?

You know, I bought a really expensive suit last summer that doesn’t fit me right anymore. Perhaps Mr. Bernanke can call Saks and have them refund my money because I ate too many Cheetos last fall!

I understand that federal officials are looking at a rather desperate situation in the economy, and in order to stave off a recession, they need to fix that nasty foreclosure issue fast.

It’s a mess, no question, and all the “Hope Now” initiatives in the world aren’t going to fix everything -- but let’s not forget the fact that people need to learn from their mistakes, not be rewarded for them.

America’s borrowers are not children, and Mommy and Daddy Government shouldn’t be paying the candy store back for the Snickers bars so many borrowers snatched, never really intending to pay for.

Let the market correct. Let home prices fall back to a level where good hard-working people can afford nice comfortable places to live. No pain, no gain.

Questions?  Comments? 

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Tools:
PrintEmailAdd This share icon
Next Post
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 05:29:33 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 10:08:23 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 06:27:51 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:08:15 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters