- Congress Gives Big 3 A "Mulligan"
- Big 3 CEOs: What They Might Have Done To Help Their Case
- Big Three: Give Congress A Reason To Buy Bailout—And Fast
- Congress To Big Three: Get Your Act Together!
- GM's Wagoner: Can He Save GM—And His Job?
- The Auto Bailout Propaganda Battle Begins
- Big Three Bailout: What It Will 'Cost' The Automakers
- Why The Worst Is Over For The Auto Industry
- Why A Bankrupt GM Is A Horrible Idea
- Chrysler Splits Up? The Possible Scenarios If It Happens
- Value Trading Opportunity of a Lifetime?
- Voice of Cramerica: Geithner's Chance for Redemption?
- Lightning Round OT: PPL, Arcelor Mittal, Cardinal Health
- Mad Money Lightning Round: CF Industries, Gentex, SunTrust and More
- Geithner News Sends Shorts Scrambling
- Berkshire Hathaway Bounces Back By 16% For Best Day In Decades
- Quick Market Stats: Week Ending 11/21
- Turkey Day Will Gobble a Bigger Bite From Your Wallet
- "Twilight" From Summit Takes A Bite Out of Major Studios
- US Inflation Bonds Hit by Deflation, May Recover
- Pros Say: Market Will Drop 5-10% — Ford Will Boom
- Bonds Drop on Profit-Taking, Geithner Move
- Jack Welch on Detroit: Let Them Go Bankrupt
- Bank Shareholders Face 'the Unthinkable': El-Erian
- Heinz Profit Rises, Thanks to Hedging
- AnnTaylor Swings to Loss, Pulls Outlook
- Where the Layoffs Are—Is Your Firm on the List?
- Citigroup's Pandit: We Will Not Sell Smith Barney

![]() |
CNBC.com Bob Nardelli |
The answers: Yes and yes.
Let's start with the turn-around. Nardelli says Chrysler has met or exceeded the targets set by the owners at Cerberus Capital. One reason is because the company set conservative projections for '08. While Nardelli did not lay out in dollars and cents how much money the automaker is losing, I wouldn't be surprised to see that the rate is much lower than in the fourth quarter of last year when Chrysler lost $1.6 Billion.
Chrysler's cutbacks have been swift and coming quick. All three would say the automaker is moving far faster than it would if still owned by a publicly traded corporation. But do Chrysler's growth plans from here remove lingering doubts about the automaker's future?
Jim Press and Tom LaSorda say the plan to build fewer cars and trucks has paid off because sales are as weak as they expected. And while critics question if Chrysler's pipeline has run dry, Press says there is a line-up on the way that will not only balance out the truck heavy line-up at Chrysler, but also provide models that will sell.
Watch the interview (in sections) here and tell me if you are convinced the automaker is on the right track.
Questions? Comments?



