|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Fast Funds: Hot Ways To Play China
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
- GM IPO in Second Quarter 2010 at the Earliest: CFO
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
ABOUT THIS BLOG
|
This blog will look at the winners and losers in the retail space. Who has the right strategy to capture consumer dollars? It also will look for trends in consumer spending and how that will impact the economy.
Text Size 
 |
Anyhow, there are some interesting nuggets in the American Apparel 10-K SEC filing. For those who are following the ongoing growth story of the company or simply the legal proceedings against CEO Dov Charney. Here's the SEC file.
What jumped out at me was the section devoted to legal proceedings. Under NOTE, the company lists a number of legal issues in addition to the ongoing suit brought by Mary Nelson (Mary Nelson v. American Apparel, Inc. et al.) Nelson alleges that she was wrongfully terminated and subjected to sexual harassment and discrimination based on her gender. She is seeking 'unspecified monetary damages and costs' but the company denies all of her allegations.
Here's the rub: APP's insurance carrier, Navigators Insurance Company, now says that it is not obligated to provide coverage for this proceeding. While American Apparel is fighting this decision, the filing notes that "no determination can be made at this time to the final outcome, nor can the range of potential loss be estimated."
My questions back in January to CEO Dov Charney about whether the company and its shareholders would be at financial risk due to this case (see related content links), certainly do seem relevant (despite management's protests at the time!) Just yesterday, the appellant's opening brief (the basis for the appeal) was filed...will this case head to trial?
There also is a claim mentioned in the 10-K brought by former employee Sylvia Hsu. It alleges that she was subjected to sexual harassment by a co-worker (the alleged offender isn't stipulated.) As of last month, American Apparel filed an appeal and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal has ordered that American Apparel file its opening brief in the appeal on July 21, 2008.
The company doesn't quantify just what this case could cost the company but the filing does say that the company only discloses claims if a loss is 'reasonably possible' and the cost amount 'could be material.'
We'll keep you posted on just where these claims head.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes