More Videos
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- The View From Newark
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Fast Funds: Hot Ways To Play China
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Earnings 101: Beyond The Big Names
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
- GM IPO in Second Quarter 2010 at the Earliest: CFO
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- It's Not the Wealthy Who Are Leaving California: Study
- Atlantic City Takes Hit as Pennsylvania Casino Opens
RSS FEED
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
In the speech in North Carolina Thursday, the Democratic presidential candidate said, "...the drug companies have had seven years of a president who stands up for them. I will be a president who stands up for all of you."
But the numbers at www.opensecrets.org show that the drug companies are banking on at least having a place at the table in a Clinton or Obama administration. Once again, based on the latest available figures as of March 20th, the two Democratic contenders are at the top of the list when it comes to presidential candidate recipients of contributions from drug manufacturers and the broader healthcare sector.
In the pharmaceuticals/healthcare products category, the web site says Sen. Obama has received more than half-a-million bucks and Sen. Clinton is a close second at $491,000.
And as I've blogged a couple of times before (see related posts below), her campaign has twice received the maximum personal contribution of $2,300 from Jeff Kindler, Chairman and CEO of the world's biggest drug company, Pfizer [PFE
Loading...
()
]. Not surprisingly, Republican Sen. John McCain has recently climbed up the list to #5 with $139,000.
And the numbers are much bigger if you look at 2008 election year cycle contributions from the entire health sector. All in, the sector has coughed up $18,000,000 so far. Clinton has grabbed more than anyone or $4.4 million of that cash, Obama has taken $3.9 million and McCain $1.4 million. Obama has also been quite vocal about not being beholden to "special interests" and "lobbyists".
And if you break it down to just the drug manufacturers, Obama is tops at $185,000, Clinton second at $177,000 and McCain 14th at $52,000. In a recent interview, the head of the CRP says the group believes this shows that while the candidate(s) may say one thing on the stump, following the money shows their true allegiances may lie elsewhere. Voters can be the judge of that.
Finally, the gap is widening between the amount of money the industry is throwing at Dems versus Republicans. In election years past, the healthcare/pharma sector has supported GOP candidates by about a two-to-one margin. So far this cycle though, the CRP says 57 percent of the industry's money is going to Democrats and 42 percent to Republicans.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes