Realty Check
Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
#DIANAOLICK ON TWITTER
- Robo-Deal Is All About Lowering Mortgage Principal
- As Mortgage Refinancings Surge, Banks Struggle
- Forty States Sign On to Foreclosure ‘Robo’ Settlement
- Running Robo-Settlement Numbers
- Own vs. Rent Riles Government Housing Policy
- Obama's Mortgage Refi Plan to Go Through FHA
- Housing Demand Defies Fundamentals
- US Treasury Forcing Mortgage Principal Forgiveness
- Robo-Reality: Final Foreclosures Fall as Pipeline Swells
- New Financial Crimes Unit Could Throw Wrench in ‘Robo’ Settlement
MOST SHARED
- Consumer Sentiment Falters, Despite Job Growth
- Bill Murray's View on the Economy
- Santelli's Morning Bond Report
- Videogame Sales Fell 34 Percent in January
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- Home of the Oscars Battles For Kodak Sponsorship
- Greek Police Union Wants to Arrest EU, IMF Officials
- Stocks Stumble as Greek Talks Stall; Vix Soars
- How to Date a Wall Street Man
- Bonus Question Dogs Barclays’ CEO Bob Diamond
- 5 Hedge Funds’ Top Stocks Soar After 2011 Rout
- This Valentine’s Day Love Is Served on a Silver Platter
- CEO to CEO: Our Roles Are Changing
- Clint Eastwood ‘Surprised’ by Reaction to Chrysler's ‘Halftime in America’ Ad
- Bulls Check In to Community Health
- Bank of America’s Worst-Case Scenario Gets More Real
- Tesla Unveils First SUV: Model X
- New York Fashion Week Hits the Runway as Colors Pop
- Mulling Buffett's Stock Advice? Get in With REITs: Fund Managers
- Is Bill Gross, PIMCO's Bond King, Losing His Touch?
- Obama to Exempt Religious Employers on Birth Control
- Bonus Bloodbath: Europe Banker Backlash Continues
- Diamond Investing: Why It's Not for the Faint of Heart
- SEC Reaches Settlement in Bear Stearns Fraud Case
- Israel Likely to Bomb Iran This Year: Political Analyst
- The World's Best Beers
- Rep. Bachus Faces Insider Trading Probe: Report
- Consumer Sentiment Falters, Despite Job Growth
REALTY CHECK VIDEO
RSS FEED
Home Builders Get Needed Break--And Yes, I Think They Should
CNBC Real Estate Reporter
![]() |
AP |
Late yesterday, after much hashing and re-hashing behind closed doors, a bipartisan team of Senators emerged with the beginnings of a bill to help troubled borrowers, local communities and the nation’s home builders.
The home builder provision is, I believe, necessary and huge for the industry.
The Senate bill, which remember is still in the very early stages, would allow builders to carry back losses on their taxes four years, i.e. to more profitable years. We all know how bad the losses have been, and being able to apply them to the boom years will surely get them some cash back. This provision was stripped out of the Economic Stimulus Package, which became law earlier this year.
Even before the Senators came out of their talks, I began to hear rumblings about the home builder tax break. A lot of critical folks claim the government shouldn’t be “bailing out” builders who overbuilt in the first place and caused all of the excess inventory that is pushing prices down. In other words, they brought it on themselves.
I say, “So what!” You’re shocked, right? But here’s how I see it: If you’re going to point the finger of blame fairly, then you have to dole out the fixes fairly as well.
There are a slew of top-brass government types on the Hill today defending their bailout of Bear Stearns [BSC
Loading...
()
] , one of the big investment houses that fuelled the subprime craze by eating up all kinds of horrid mortgage products that were doomed to fail.
Bear got greedy and Bear got the bailout. And everyone and their brother, from the Treasury Secretary to FHA to Fannie to Freddie are jumping over each other to bail out troubled borrowers, many of whom frankly should have known better than to get into mortgages that were WAY over their heads. They were greedy, and they’re getting the bailout.
So why not the builders? They’re no more to blame than anyone else in this mess, and therefore they should get some help as well.
These are the companies that build everyone’s biggest investment, and I think we need to invest a bit in them, even if they did get on the boom-bandwagon like everyone else. Unless of course you’d rather see your new three-bedroom three-bath colonial shipped over in pieces from China.
Questions? Comments?











