Skip navigation

Realty Check

 

  Current Housing Indicators
CURRENTPREVIOUS
Existing Home Sales4.49m4.74m
New Home Sales309,000344,000
Housing Starts583,000477,000
Building Permits547,000531,000
HMI9UNCH9
Existing Home Prices$170,300▼ (annually)$199,800
New Home Prices$201,100▼ (annually)$232,400
 
Realty Check Video Gallery
CNBC's Diana Olick takes a look at the top issues for builders, which include financing for future developments.
CNBC's Jim Cramer shares six stocks to watch, and reveals them in under 60 seconds.
 
HOMEBUILDERS TOP 10 INDEX
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

#DIANAOLICK ON TWITTER


Current DateTime: 09:25:39 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23279692
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 9:27:52 AM

Current DateTime: 09:25:39 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 35933407
  • The 10 Emptiest US Cities

      It’s no secret that the U.S. housing market has seen better days. So, what are the emptiest major U.S. cities?

  • Most Expensive States

      Your dollar won't get as far in these ten states. Which states are the most expensive to live in?

  • Inspired Homes

      From the Simpsons TV show, to the White House to Snow White, here are homes inspired by others.

MOST SHARED


Current DateTime: 09:25:39 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 31330905
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 9:27:45 AM

Current DateTime: 09:25:39 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452000
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 9:27:40 AM

Current DateTime: 09:25:39 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452764
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 9:27:24 AM

REALTY CHECK VIDEO

» More

Current DateTime: 09:25:41 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 30871294
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 9:27:34 AM

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 09:25:42 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 30871303

Home Builders Get Needed Break--And Yes, I Think They Should

Published: Thursday, 3 Apr 2008 | 12:33 PM ET
Text Size
By: Diana Olick
CNBC Real Estate Reporter

AP

Late yesterday, after much hashing and re-hashing behind closed doors, a bipartisan team of Senators emerged with the beginnings of a bill to help troubled borrowers, local communities and the nation’s home builders.

The home builder provision is, I believe, necessary and huge for the industry.

The Senate bill, which remember is still in the very early stages, would allow builders to carry back losses on their taxes four years, i.e. to more profitable years. We all know how bad the losses have been, and being able to apply them to the boom years will surely get them some cash back. This provision was stripped out of the Economic Stimulus Package, which became law earlier this year.

Even before the Senators came out of their talks, I began to hear rumblings about the home builder tax break. A lot of critical folks claim the government shouldn’t be “bailing out” builders who overbuilt in the first place and caused all of the excess inventory that is pushing prices down. In other words, they brought it on themselves.

I say, “So what!” You’re shocked, right? But here’s how I see it: If you’re going to point the finger of blame fairly, then you have to dole out the fixes fairly as well.

There are a slew of top-brass government types on the Hill today defending their bailout of Bear Stearns [BSC  Loading...      ()   ] , one of the big investment houses that fuelled the subprime craze by eating up all kinds of horrid mortgage products that were doomed to fail.

Bear got greedy and Bear got the bailout. And everyone and their brother, from the Treasury Secretary to FHA to Fannie to Freddie are jumping over each other to bail out troubled borrowers, many of whom frankly should have known better than to get into mortgages that were WAY over their heads. They were greedy, and they’re getting the bailout.

So why not the builders? They’re no more to blame than anyone else in this mess, and therefore they should get some help as well.

These are the companies that build everyone’s biggest investment, and I think we need to invest a bit in them, even if they did get on the boom-bandwagon like everyone else. Unless of course you’d rather see your new three-bedroom three-bath colonial shipped over in pieces from China.

Questions?  Comments? 

© 2012 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Current DateTime: 05:18:53 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 04:15:11 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 09:12:37 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779197

Current DateTime: 04:14:52 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779199
CNBCCNBC
About CNBC  |  Site Map  |  Video Reprints   |  Advertise  |  Help  |  Contact
Privacy Policy  |     |  Terms of Service  |  Independent Programming Report
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2012 CNBC LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBCUniversal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters