Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Bank-owned Inventory: Move it!
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- Home Prices: Are We There Yet?
- Treasury: Jingle Mail A Myth
- How Bad Is The Housing Market? One Man's Tale
- Appraisal Code Sparks Huge Response
- New Rules on Home Appraisals End Up Thwarting Many Sales
- Mortgage Bankers Slash 2009 Forecasts
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Investing in Tech Now
- Apartment Vacancy Rate Hits 22-Year High
- What You'll See On My NASCAR Documentary Tonight
- Warren Buffett: Economy Needs Another Dose of Viagra
- Warren Buffett's Complete Sun Valley CNBC Interview - Transcript and Video
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon-Trading
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- Cramer?s Outrage
- Preparing for Retirement
- Buffett: Second Stimulus Might Be Needed for Economy
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- July 10th in Market History
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Options Smell 'Blood' on Infosys
- Christmas in July: Consumers To Out-Scrooge Scrooge
- GM's Second Chance
- Art Cashin: Traders Weigh Obama Policy Changes
- Warren Buffett: Economy Needs Another Dose of Viagra
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Assets Are Less Toxic, but Banks Have Other Troubles
- AIG Prepares to Pay More Bonuses: Report
- Chevron Says Q2 Hit by US Refining, Weak Dollar
- Stimulus Critics Put Obama, Democrats on Defensive
- Warren Buffett: Consumer Sales Remain 'Very, Very Soft'
- Japan Deflation Deepens as Wholesale Prices Tumble
- Australian PM Says Caution Needed on China Spy Case
- Don’t Get Burned By Hot Emerging Markets
- Busch: Chinese Bank Announces Bombshell
RSS FEED

![]() |
AP |
Late yesterday, after much hashing and re-hashing behind closed doors, a bipartisan team of Senators emerged with the beginnings of a bill to help troubled borrowers, local communities and the nation’s home builders.
The home builder provision is, I believe, necessary and huge for the industry.
The Senate bill, which remember is still in the very early stages, would allow builders to carry back losses on their taxes four years, i.e. to more profitable years. We all know how bad the losses have been, and being able to apply them to the boom years will surely get them some cash back. This provision was stripped out of the Economic Stimulus Package, which became law earlier this year.
Even before the Senators came out of their talks, I began to hear rumblings about the home builder tax break. A lot of critical folks claim the government shouldn’t be “bailing out” builders who overbuilt in the first place and caused all of the excess inventory that is pushing prices down. In other words, they brought it on themselves.
I say, “So what!” You’re shocked, right? But here’s how I see it: If you’re going to point the finger of blame fairly, then you have to dole out the fixes fairly as well.
There are a slew of top-brass government types on the Hill today defending their bailout of Bear Stearns [BSC
Loading...
()
] , one of the big investment houses that fuelled the subprime craze by eating up all kinds of horrid mortgage products that were doomed to fail.
Bear got greedy and Bear got the bailout. And everyone and their brother, from the Treasury Secretary to FHA to Fannie to Freddie are jumping over each other to bail out troubled borrowers, many of whom frankly should have known better than to get into mortgages that were WAY over their heads. They were greedy, and they’re getting the bailout.
So why not the builders? They’re no more to blame than anyone else in this mess, and therefore they should get some help as well.
These are the companies that build everyone’s biggest investment, and I think we need to invest a bit in them, even if they did get on the boom-bandwagon like everyone else. Unless of course you’d rather see your new three-bedroom three-bath colonial shipped over in pieces from China.
Questions? Comments?












